Author: Marion Ho-Dac

by Marion Ho-Dac 7 April 2020 0

Conferences, academic events etc. Developments in PIL

Webinar on Force Majeure and Hardship in Commercial Contracts

A free webinar on Force Majeure and Hardship under Cross-border and Comparative Perspectives will take place on 8 April 2020 at 17.00Continue Reading

by Marion Ho-Dac 2 April 2020 2

Peters, Gless, Thomale & Weller on Business and Human Rights

Anne Peters (Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law), Sabine Gless (University of Basel), Chris Thomale (Ruprecht-KarlsContinue Reading

by Marion Ho-Dac 24 March 2020 0

Case law Developments in PIL

‘Large Risks’ Insurance Contracts: CJEU Rules on the Enforceability of a Choice-of-Court Clause

On 27 February 2020 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling in BALTA, a caseContinue Reading

Marc Weller on Peters, Gless, Thomale & Weller on Business and Human Rights: “Dear Colleague, We argue that victims of human rights violations should be free to choose the tort law applicable to…”
Eduardo Álvarez-Armas on Peters, Gless, Thomale & Weller on Business and Human Rights: “Very interesting article, and very valuable, especially in its descriptive dimension. However, the point on the "applicable law to human-rights…”
Fabrizio Marongiu Buonaiuti on Anti-Anti-Suit Injunctions by German Courts – What Goes Around, Comes Around: “Thank you Gilles for your very interesting remarks. Certainly, the traditional view expressed by the French case law you were…”
Gilles Cuniberti on Anti-Anti-Suit Injunctions by German Courts – What Goes Around, Comes Around: “Thank you Fabrizio for these very interestings comments. They raise many points. For the time being, allow me to focus…”
Fabrizio Marongiu Buonaiuti on Anti-Anti-Suit Injunctions by German Courts – What Goes Around, Comes Around: “Thank you very much. I appreciate Mariangela Lamanna's point on the Nait-Liman case. It is certainly true, and the European…”