Author Archive for: The Editors of the EAPIL blog

Entries by The Editors of the EAPIL blog

, , , ,

EAPIL Winter School – Highlights from the Webinar Ahead of the 2026 Edition

The third edition of the EAPIL Winter School will take place in Como between 2 and 6 February 2026. The upcoming edition’s general topic is Values in Private International Law. Day 1 will be about the protection of weaker contractual parties. The concerns surrounding torts will be dealt with in Day 2. Day 3, on […]

,

Cupriak-Trojan: A First Reading from a Private International Law Perspective

This post was written by Laima Vaigė, Associate Professor and Senior Lecturer in Private International Law at Uppsala University. It is the first contribution to the EAPIL on-line symposium on the ruling of the Court of Justice in Cupriak-Trojan. The Court of Justice of the European Union delivered a landmark Grand Chamber judgment in Cupriak-Trojan (C-713/23) […]

,

The CJEU Acting as a Lawmaker: Article 7(2) of the Brussels I bis Regulation as a New Forum Actoris for Collective Actions

This post was contributed by Burkhard Hess, who is professor at the University of Vienna. Two more contributions on the ruling of the Court of Justice in Apple Store Nederland appeared on this blog since this post was published, one by Jorg Sladic, the other by Gilles Cuniberti. On 2 December 2025, the Grand Chamber […]

,

Second Meeting of the EAPIL Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions – Report (Part II)

This post was written by Birgit van Houtert and Marco Pasqua, co-Chairs of the EAPIL Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions, as report of the Working Group’s second meeting. This post follows up on the report (Part I). The second meeting of the Working Group provided an overview of a selection of national transposition acts […]

,

Second Meeting of the EAPIL Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions – Report (Part I)

This post was written by Birgit van Houtert and Marco Pasqua, co-Chairs of the EAPIL Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions. It is the first part of a report on the Working Group’s second meeting. This post continues with the report (Part II). On 18 November 2025, the EAPIL Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions […]

Paolo Picone (6 April 1940 – 26 October 2025)

The author of this post is Massimo Benedettelli, formerly a Professor of International law at the University of Bari “Aldo Moro”. One of the leading jurists of the twentieth century has passed away. If the Italian academic tradition requires all international law professors to be versed in conflicts and the law of nations at once, […]

, ,

Grounded or Groundless? The Supranational Approach in Light of the Digital Assets Bill

This post was written by Aygun Mammadzada, Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in Law at the Swansea University. It is the fifth contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the Law Commission of England and Wales’s Consultation Paper on Digital Assets and Electronic Trade Documents in Private International Law. The post is based on the author’s presentation […]

, ,

Section 72 of the Bills of Exchange Act 1882

This post was written by Sagi Peari, Associate Professor in Private and Commercial Law at the University of Western Australia Law School. It is the fourth contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the Law Commission of England and Wales’s Consultation Paper on Digital Assets and Electronic Trade Documents in Private International Law. Readers are encouraged […]

, ,

Digital Assets and PIL: What is “Supranational” in the “Supranational Approach” of the Law Commission?

This post was written by Matthias Lehmann, Professor at the University of Vienna. It is the third contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the Law Commission of England and Wales’s Consultation Paper on Digital Assets and Electronic Trade Documents in Private International Law. Readers are encouraged to participate in the discussion by commenting on the […]

, ,

“Supranational Approach” to the Conflict of Laws in England and Wales: A Workable Solution for Digital Assets?

This post was written by Burcu Yüksel Ripley, Professor at the University of Aberdeen School of Law. It is the second contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the Law Commission of England and Wales’s Consultation Paper on Digital Assets and Electronic Trade Documents in Private International Law. Readers are encouraged to participate in the […]

, ,

The Law Commission’s Proposed Free-Standing Information Order

This post was written by Koji Takahashi, Professor at the Doshisha University Law School. It is the first contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the Law Commission of England and Wales’s Consultation Paper on Digital Assets and Electronic Trade Documents in Private International Law. Readers are encouraged to participate in the discussion by commenting […]

,

Cabris Investment: Has the CJEU Forgotten About the Hague Convention?

This post was contributed by Gilles Cuniberti, Brooke Marshall and Louise Ellen Teitz. They are the authors (with the late Peter Mankowski) of a commentary on the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements forthcoming with Edward Elgar. On 9 October 2025, the CJEU delivered its judgment in Case C-540/24, Cabris Investment already discussed […]

, , , ,

Reminder: The Upcoming Edition of the the EAPIL Winter School

After two successful editions (here and here), the new edition of the EAPIL Winter School is scheduled to held on-site in Como, in the cloister of the Basilica di Sant’Abbondio, from 2 to 6 February 2026. It is organised by the European Association of Private International Law and the Department of Law, Economics and Cultures of the […]

, ,

Challenging the Fragmented Treatment of Distribution Agreements in EU Private International Law

This post was contributed by Heloise Meur, who is a lecturer at Paris 8 University. International distribution agreements are a significant source of litigation which result in legal uncertainty. First, these contracts are not typical ones: they belong to a group of contracts which organize a kind of cooperation between the parties. Second, they are […]

,

Supporting Families Following International Child Abduction – Online Survey

Professors Marilyn Freeman (University of Westminster, UK) and Nicola Taylor (University of Otago, NZ) are carrying out a research project on international child abduction. The research investigates what happens after children have been removed to, or retained in, a country in a way which is considered wrongful in law. This is an issue which has […]

Here We Go Again: Beware of Scammers!

On various occasions in the past we have warned the readers of this blog of fraudulent e-mails sent to EAPIL members by persons impersonating Gilles Cuniberti, the President of the Association. As customary with this kind of scams, the scammers ask for money, and insist to have it urgently. Just don’t let them fool you. […]

, , ,

The EAPIL Winter School 2026: Values in Private International Law

As already announced on this blog, the next edition of the Winter School of the European Association of Private International Law will take place in Como from 2 to 6 February 2026. The general topic of the upcoming edition is Values in Private International Law. The teaching staff will consist of Laura Carpaneto (University of […]

, ,

Jäger-Maillet on the Cross-border Recovery of Family Maintenance by Public Bodies

Isabelle Jäger-Maillet, a family lawyer who also serves as the International Coordinator for the German Institute for Youth Services and Family Law in Heidelberg (DIJuF), kindly provided a presentation of her dissertation titled Fortentwicklung des grenzüberschreitenden Unterhaltsvorschussregresses, on the improvement of maintenance recovery by public bodies, recently published by Wolfgang Metzner Verlag. In European countries, […]

, , ,

Migliorini and Ilhão Moreira on the EU AI Act and Arbitration

This post was written by Sara Migliorini and João Ilhão Moreira, who both teach at the Faculty of Law of the University of Macau. It builds on article they co-authored, titled Clashing Frameworks: the EU AI Act and Arbitration, just published on the European Journal of Risk Regulation. The EU AI Act (hereinafter, the “Act” […]

Which Country’s Copyright Law Governs the Training and Development of Generative AI for Commercial Purposes? A Stress Test for Copyright Territoriality

The author of this post is Michiel Poesen, co-director of the Centre for Private International Law and Transnational Governance and lecturer of private international law at the University of Aberdeen. This post considers which country’s copyright law governs the training and development (“T&D”) of generative AI (“GenAI”) for commercial purposes. It does so from a […]

,

Green Light for the Application of Religious Rules in Arbitration of Pecuniary Claims

This post was written by Paul Eichmüller, University of Vienna. A recent decision by the Regional Civil Court of Vienna has sparked controversy in Austrian media. The outcry was due to the fact that the court allowed the enforcement of a domestic arbitral award that was based on “Islamic law (Ahl as-Sunna wa-l-Ǧamāʿa) according to […]

,

The EAPIL Blog Turns to Summer Mode

The EAPIL blog will be publishing fewer posts than usual in the course of August. As in previous years, there will be no more than two or three posts per week until 25 August, when we plan to resume our usual pace. Potential guests are encouraged to keep submitting their proposals at blog@eapil.org, in the […]

,

Dutch Court Denies Exequatur of Ukrainian Judgment against Gazprom under the Hague Judgments Convention

The author of this post is Pierfrancesco Rossi, tenured researcher of International Law at the University of Teramo. On 5 June 2025, the Hague Court of Appeal declined to grant exequatur to a Ukrainian judgment holding Russian energy giant Gazprom jointly and severally liable for material damages incurred during Russia’s invasion of the country. The […]

,

First Meeting and Questionnaire of the EAPIL Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions – Report

The authors of this post are Birgit van Houtert and Marco Pasqua, co-Chairs of the EAPIL Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions. The post is the result of the collective work of the members of the Working Group. On 27 June 2025, the EAPIL Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions held its first online meeting, […]

, , , ,

The Third Edition of the EAPIL Winter School: A Preview

Building on the success of the two previous editions (here and here), the third edition of the EAPIL Winter School is currently being organised by the European Association of Private International Law and the Department of Law, Economics and Cultures of the University of Insubria in Como, in cooperation with the Law Faculty of the University […]

,

Rodríguez Benot on the Property Regime of Couples in Private International Law

The special course given by Andrés Rodríguez Benot (Pablo de Olavide University Sevilla) at the Hague Academy of International Law on Le régime économique des mariages et des partenariats enregistrés en droit international privé (The Property Regime of Marriages and Registered Partnerships in Private International Law) has been published in Volume 445 of the Collected […]

, ,

How Omnibus Risks Opening a Major Gap in the Enforcement of the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive

The author of this post is Rob Rooman, PhD Researcher at KULeuven. Ever since its adoption, the future of Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence (hereinafter, the CS3D) has been unsure. The Directive in general is facing significant political resistance, and […]

, ,

International Family Relocation: Where to Next?

The author of this post is Nishat Hyder-Rahman, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, MSCA Impact Fellowship Programme, Department of Private and Economic Law, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.  She is also a volunteer researcher at GlobalARRK and presented findings from the GlobalARRK report in panel 2 of the conference. The views expressed in this post are the author’s own, […]

,

State Immunity from Insolvency-based Avoidance Actions: What to Expect from the CJEU?

The author of this post is Antonio Leandro, Professor of Public and Private International Law at the University of Bari (Italy). On 23 January 2025, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/848 […]

,

EAPIL Call to Join the Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions

The European Association of Private International Law calls for expressions of interest from its members in participating in a Working Group on Anti-SLAPP Directive Transpositions (hereinafter, ‘WG’). The WG, co-chaired by Birgit van Houtert (Netherlands) and Marco Pasqua (Italy), seeks to contribute to the study and development of private international law (PIL) by identifying challenges […]

,

Seventh In-Person Meeting of the EAPIL Working Group on International Property Law to Take Place in Antwerp

The author of this post is Jonathan Schenk (University of Antwerp). The EAPIL Working Group on International Property Law will hold its seventh in-person meeting in Antwerp from 22 to 24 May 2025. The University of Antwerp will warmly receive the participants as host of the meeting. Since its establishment nearly four years ago, the […]

, , ,

Dominelli on Brussels I bis Regulation and US Jurisdiction

Stefano Dominelli (Univ. of Genova) has authored ‘Regolamento Bruxelles I bis e US jurisdiction in personam: riflessioni e proposte su condivisioni valoriali, influenze e osmosi di metodi’ (Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, 2025). The volume, in Italian (with the conclusive chapter also translated in English) is freely accessible online. He has shared the following presentation of his […]

,

Report of the Oxford Conference on “Characterisation in the Conflict of Laws”

The author of this report is Meltem Ece Oba (Koç University, Istanbul). The post is being published simultaneously on Conflictoflaws.net and on the EAPIL blog. On 20-21 March 2025, a conference on “Characterisation in the Conflict of Laws” was convened at St Hilda’s College, Oxford. Under the auspices of the Institute of European and Comparative […]

,

The CJEU on Payments to an Insolvent Debtor under the European Insolvency Regulation

The author of this post is Antonio Leandro, Professor of Public and Private International Law at the University of Bari (Italy). On 27 March 2025, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in the Auto1 European Cars case (C-186/24 Matthäus Metzler, acting as insolvency practitioner in insolvency proceedings, v Auto1 European Cars BV), which deals […]

, ,

BSH Hausgeräte: A Game-Changer in Cross-border Patent Litigation

The author of this post is Lydia Lundstedt, who is an Associate Professor and Senior Lecturer at Stockholm University and Linköping University. In the interest of transparency, the author makes known that she previously wrote an expert legal opinion on behalf of BSH Hausgeräte. On 25 February 2025, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice […]

, , , ,

Save the Date: The Third Edition of the EAPIL Winter School in Como

Building on the success of the two previous editions (here and here), a new edition of the EAPIL Winter School is currently being organized by the European Association of Private International Law and the Department of Law, Economics and Cultures of the University of Insubria in Como, in cooperation with the Law Faculty of the […]

, ,

Progress and Challenges for SLAPP Targets from the Perspective of EU and Dutch PIL

This post was written by Birgit van Houtert, Assistant Professor of Private International Law at Maastricht University. It builds on an article titled ‘The Anti-SLAPP Directive in the Context of EU and Dutch Private International Law: Improvements and (Remaining) Challenges to Protect SLAPP targets’, featured in issued 4 of 2024 of Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht. Apart from providing […]

, , , ,

The EAPIL Winter School on Multistate Torts: Report

This post was written by Silvia Marino, Professor of EU law at the University of Insubria in Como, and Director of the EAPIL Winter School. The second edition of the EAPIL Winter School in European Private International Law took place at the Department of Law, Economics and Cultures of the University of Insubria in Como […]

, , ,

Save the Date: the 2026 EAPIL Conference in Geneva

After the first successful conferences in Aarhus (2022) and Wroclaw (2024), the European Association of Private International Law is set to hold its next conference in Geneva, on 18, 19 and 20 June 2026. The title chosen for the conference is Shaping the Future of Private International Law in Europe. Further details on both the […]

, , , , ,

First Book in the EAPIL Series: Private International Law in an Era of Change

The first book in the European Association of Private International Law series, announced in an earlier post on this blog, is out. Edited by Morten M. Fogt (Aarhus University), the volume, published by Edward Elgar, builds on the presentations delivered at the EAPIL Founding Conference held in Aarhus in June 2022. The chapters discuss current […]

Jigsaw Pieces Falling into Place: Do the Territorial Scopes of the AI Act and the Revised Product Liability Directive Dovetail?

This post has been written by Michiel Poesen, lecturer in private international law at the University of Aberdeen. The author asks the question whether the territorial scope of the European AI Act and the Revised Product Liability Directive are consistent. Both instruments are intended to work in tandem. While the former sets out the obligations […]

,

The Spanish Supreme Court on Surrogacy Contract and Public Policy

This post was written by Ottavia Cazzola, a PhD candidate at the University of Barcelona Barcelona participating in Action Grant “Towards Universal Parenthood in Europe (UniPAR)” (JUST-2023-JCOO; Project ID: 101137859). On 4 December 2024, the Spanish Supreme Court issued a decision stating that the recognition of a foreign judgment establishing filiation regarding the commissioning parents […]

,

Common Law Remains ‘Immoveable’ in Matters of Cross-Border Insolvency

This post has been written by Yiannis Bazinas, Managing Partner, Bazinas Law Firm, Athens, Greece. The effect of insolvency proceedings on assets located in different jurisdictions is perhaps the most typical issue one encounters in cross-border insolvency cases. Still, under English law, the rather fundamental question of what effect a foreign insolvency has on assets […]

,

French Courts Lack Jurisdiction to Hear Case on France’s Alleged Liability for Genocide Against the Tutsi

This post has been written by Delphine Porcheron, Maître de conférences HDR, University of Strasbourg. On 14 November 2024, the Administrative Court of Paris dismissed a lawsuit filed by Rwandan citizens and associations seeking to hold the French State accountable for its role in the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda, a massacre that […]

,

Lithuanian Court of Appeal Rules on Anti-SLAPP Procedures Related to Lawyers’ Professional Activities

This post has been written by Artur Doržinkevič, a PhD candidate and a lecturer at Mykolas Romeris University. On 21 November 2024, the Lithuanian Court of Appeal issued a ruling in civil case No. e2-651-912/2024, which provided further clarification regarding anti-SLAPP procedures as they pertain to lawyers. Although the case concerned domestic anti-SLAPP procedure, the […]

,

Bulgarfrukt and Service Requirements: National EOP Implementation Legislation vs the Service Regulation

This post was written by Elena Alina Onţanu, Assistant Professor at the University of Tilburg, and Carlos Santaló Goris, Postdoctoral Researcher at the University of Luxembourg. The Bulgarfrukt judgment is the latest in a series of cases submitted by national judges to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in which the service […]

, ,

The Hague Academy’s Course on the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments – Report

This post has been written by Bryan (H.B.) Verheul, PhD Candidate in Private International Law, Leiden University. He attended the Advanced Course in Hong Kong as a participant. Between 2 and 6 December 2024, the second edition of The Hague Academy of International Law’s Advanced Course on Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and […]

, ,

PostScriptum: Barrick Gold in the Canadian Court, the Jurisdictional Veil and What Lies Ahead

This post has been written by Ekaterina Aristova, Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow, Bonavero Institute of Human Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford. It is the sixth and final post in the EAPIL blog on-line symposium on Ekaterina Aristova, Tort Litigation against Transnational Corporations: The Challenge of Jurisdiction in English Courts (OUP 2024). The […]

, ,

Who is Benefiting from the ‘Neutrality’ of Private International Law?

This post has been written by Dalia Palombo, Assistant Professor of Human Rights Law, Department of Public Law and Governance, Tilburg University. It is the fifth post in the EAPIL blog on-line symposium on Ekaterina Aristova, Tort Litigation against Transnational Corporations: The Challenge of Jurisdiction in English Courts (OUP 2024). The others contributions, by Ekaterina Aristova, […]

, ,

A Different Forum (Non) Conveniens Test for Tort Litigation against Transnational Corporations?

This post has been written by Mukarrum Ahmed, Lecturer in Business Law, Lancaster University. It is the fourth post in the EAPIL blog on-line symposium on Ekaterina Aristova, Tort Litigation against Transnational Corporations: The Challenge of Jurisdiction in English Courts (OUP 2024). The others contributions, by Ekaterina Aristova, Peter Muchlinski, Geert Van Calster, Dalia Palombo […]

, ,

Jurisdiction of English Courts in Foreign Direct Liability Claims

This post has been written by Geert Van Calster, Professor of Private International Law, KU Leuven and member of the Belgian Bar. It is the third post in the EAPIL blog online symposium on Ekaterina Aristova, Tort Litigation against Transnational Corporations: The Challenge of Jurisdiction in English Courts (OUP 2024). The others contributions, by Ekaterina Aristova, […]

, , ,

Tort Litigation Against Transnational Corporations in the Business and Human Rights Framework

This post has been written by Peter Muchlinski, Emeritus Professor of International Commercial Law, The School of Law, Gender and Media, SOAS, University of London. It is the second post in the EAPIL blog online symposium on Ekaterina Aristova, Tort Litigation against Transnational Corporations: The Challenge of Jurisdiction in English Courts (OUP 2024). The others […]

, ,

Tort Litigation against Transnational Corporations and the Challenge of Jurisdiction: An Introduction

This post has been written by Ekaterina Aristova, Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow, Bonavero Institute of Human Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Oxford. It is the first post in the EAPIL blog online symposium on Ekaterina Aristova, Tort Litigation against Transnational Corporations: The Challenge of Jurisdiction in English Courts (OUP 2024). The others contributions, […]

, , , ,

EAPIL Winter School 2025: Only a Few Days Left to Benefit from the Early Bird Fee

The readers of tis blog are aware that the second edition of the EAPIL Winter School on private international law will take place in Como between 10 and 15 February 2025. Organised by the University of Insubria, in cooperation with the Jagiellonian University in Kraków and the University of Murcia, the 2025 edition is about multistate […]

, ,

Improving the Settlement of (International) Commercial Disputes in Germany

This post was written by Prof. Dr. Giesela Rühl, LL.M. (Berkeley), Humboldt University of Berlin, and is also available via conflictoflaws.net.  As reported earlier on this blog, Germany has been discussing for years how the framework conditions for the settlement of (international) commercial disputes can be improved. Triggered by increasing competition from international commercial arbitration […]

, , ,

Conference on the Reform of Belgian Property Law and Law of Obligations

This post was written by Verena Wodniansky-Wildenfeld. On 28 November 2024, the University of Vienna, in cooperation with the Association Henri Capitant (German and Belgian branches) and the Interdisciplinary Association of Comparative and Private International Law (IACPIL), will host a conference on The Reform of Belgian Property Law and Law of Obligations. The event will […]

, ,

Individual Actions Against Insolvent Debtors: CJEU Clarifies Rationale of Insolvency Exception

This post is authored by Antonio Leandro, Professor of Public and Private International Law at the University of Bari. On 14 November 2024, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in the Oilchart case (C-394/22 Oilchart International NV v O.W. Bunker (Netherlands) BV, ING Bank NV), which deals with the ‘insolvency exception’ provided in Article […]

,

Digital Assets in Scots Private Law

‘Digital Assets in Scots Private Law: Innovating for the Future‘ is a research project led by the University of Aberdeen with collaborators from the University of Edinburgh, University of Dundee (formerly from Edinburgh Napier University) and international law firm CMS. The third workshop of the project examined the Intra-UK and International Dimensions of Digital Assets […]

, ,

CJEU Clarifies the Influence of Fundamental Rights on the Operation of the Public Policy Exception

This post was contributed by Fabien Marchadier, who is a professor of private international law at the University of Poitiers. On 4 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered its judgment in Case C-633/22 Real Madrid Club de Fútbol v. Société éditrice Le Monde. The judgment explores the relationship between the public policy […]

, ,

Proper Place to Grant an Anti-Suit Injunction: A Perspective from France

This post was written by Etienne Farnoux, who is Professor of Private Law at the University of Strasbourg. It is the third contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the UK Supreme Court Judgment in UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC [2024] UKSC 30. The previous contributions, by Manuel Penades and Faidon Varesis can be found […]

, ,

Is UniCredit the Final Frontier in Granting Anti-Suit Injunctions in England?

This post was written by Faidon Varesis, who is Assistant Professor in Private International Law and International Dispute Resolution at the University of Cambridge and a Fellow of St John’s College. It is the second contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the UK Supreme Court Judgment in UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC [2024] UKSC […]

, ,

The Law Governing Arbitration Agreements in England after UniCredit

This post was written by Manuel Penades, who is Reader in International Commercial Law at King’s College London. It is the first contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the UK Supreme Court Judgment in UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC [2024] UKSC 30. The other contributions, by Faidon Varesis and Etienne Farnoux, can be found […]

,

Economic Sanctions in Swedish Private International Law

On 8 November 2024 Gunnar Bramstång will publicly defend his doctoral thesis on economic sanctions in private international law at Lund University in Sweden. The thesis, written in Swedish, is titled Ekonomiska sanktioner i svensk internationell privat– och processrätt (Economic Sanctions in Swedish Private International Law) and is available in its entirety here. The English abstract […]

,

CJEU Rules on the Material Scope of the Brussels I bis Regulation

This post was contributed by Vincent Richard, who practices with Wurth Kinsch Olinger in Luxembourg. On 4 October 2024, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in case C‑494/23 [Mahá]. The decision, which was rendered without an Opinion from the Advocate General, provides a useful clarification on the material scope of Regulation No 1215/2012 (Brussels […]

,

The Anglo-French Approaches to Arbitration Conference on 17 October 2024 at King’s College London

This post has been written by Reef Alfahad, a PhD candidate at King’s College London. On 17 October 2024, a conference on ‘The Anglo-French Approaches to Arbitration’ will take place at King’s College London, UK. This conference will discuss how the French and English approaches differ when dealing with corruption in arbitration and anti-suit injunctions, […]

,

French Supreme Court Defines Legal Effects of Foreign Surrogacy and Adds Reasons Requirement

This post was written by Mathilde Codazzi, who is a doctoral student at Paris II Pantheon-Assas. On 2 October 2024, the French Cour de cassation issued two decisions regarding respectively the conditions for declaring enforceable foreign judgments establishing legal parentage between a child born abroad to a surrogate mother and the intended parents and the effects […]

,

The Limited Impact of Article 8 ECHR on Article 13(1)(b) Hague Child Abduction Convention

The author of this post is Nishat Hyder-Rahman, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, MSCA Impact Fellowship Programme, Department of Private and Economic Law, Vrije Universiteit Brussel. A previous post on this post discussed the chamber decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case of Verhoeven v France. The case concerned whether the French […]

,

CJEU Rules on COMI of Individuals

This post is authored by Antonio Leandro, Professor of Public and Private International Law at the University of Bari. On 19 September 2024, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in case C-501/23 DL v Land Berlin, which deals with the functioning of the COMI in Regulation (EU) 2015/848 on insolvency proceedings (‘EIR’). The Court […]

,

Can Article 8 ECHR Reshape the Operation of Article 13(1)(b) of The Hague Child Abduction Convention?

The author of this post is Nishat Hyder-Rahman, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, MSCA Impact Fellowship Programme, Department of Private and Economic Law, Vrije Universiteit Brussel. On 28 March 2024, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled on the case of Verhoeven v France. The case concerned whether the French courts’ application of the Hague Convention […]

, ,

AG Emiliou Confirms His First Opinion in BSH Hausgeräte: Article 24(4) of Brussels I bis Has Reflexive Effect

The author of this post is Lydia Lundstedt, who is an Associate Professor and Senior Lecturer at Stockholm University, and currently a STINT fellow at the University of Botswana. In the interest of transparency, the author makes known that she previously wrote an expert legal opinion on behalf of BSH Hausgeräte. On 5 September 2024, […]

, ,

The Need for a Global Cooperation Framework Regarding Migrant Workers

The central theme of the latest issue of the Revue critique de droit international privé (announced on this blog here) is migration. While most of the articles focus on the new French statute to control immigration and improve integration, Hans van Loon takes a broader perspective and argues in the opening article (La nécessité d’un cadre […]

, , , ,

Save the Dates: Second Edition of the EAPIL Winter School in Como

Building on the success of the first edition, a new edition of the EAPIL Winter School is being organized by the European Association of Private International Law, together with the Department of Law, Economics and Cultures of the University of Insubria in Como (Italy), with the Law Faculty of the University of Murcia (Spain) and […]

,

French Supreme Court Rules Primary Matrimonial Property Regime is an Overriding Mandatory Provision

This post was written by Fabienne Jault-Seseke, who is Professor of Private Law at the University of Versailles Saint-Quentin (Paris Saclay). On 12 June 2024, the French Supreme Court for civil and criminal matters (Cour de cassation) confirmed in a ruling that the “primary” matrimonial property regime is defined by mandatory laws, which are applicable […]

In Memoriam: Marko Ilešič

By Professor Jerca Kramberger-Škerl, University of Ljubljana. ‘Speaks 13 languages, can tell a joke in 7, can lecture in 8.’ This was the headline of a 2015 article in the Slovenian newspaper Dnevnik, marking the third appointment of Marko Ilešič as the Slovenian judge at the Court of Justice of the European Union. Indeed, being […]

, , ,

Report on the 2024 EAPIL Conference: Private International Law and Global Crises

The authors of this post are Leon Theimer (Humboldt University of Berlin) and Nicolas Dewitte (Humboldt University of Berlin). Introduction From 6 to 8 June, around 100 members of the EAPIL gathered in the captivatingly charming city of Wrocław in Poland for the 2024 EAPIL conference on ‘Private International Law and Global Crises’. Over the […]

,

Jurisdiction in Litigation Against Insolvent Parties. Oilchart and the Opinion of AG Medina

The author of this post is Manuel Penades Fons, Reader in International Commercial Law at the Dickson Poon School of Law at King’s College London, United Kingdom. Introduction In Oilchart the CJEU needs to decide whether a creditor can commence proceedings in an EU Member State against a party which is already subject to insolvency […]

, ,

New Book on Cross-Border Child Relocation in the EU

Olga Ceran (Leiden University) has kindly prepared this presentation of her recent book titled Cross-Border Child Relocation in the EU – The Dynamics of Europeanisation published by Intersentia in 2024 in its European Family Law series. This book is the first monograph to investigate cross-border child relocation as a unique legal issue in the EU context. The […]

, ,

Air Berlin Online Symposium: Assets relocation and avoidance actions in the interest of local creditors

This is the second post in the online symposium on the recent judgment of the CJEU in Air Berlin (see also here). It is authored by Antonio Leandro (University of Bari, Italy), who edited and contributed to the recent Elgar Commentary on the European Insolvency Regulation and Implementing Legislations. The first post was authored by […]

,

Book Launch Online Symposium: Air Berlin

On 18 April 2024, the CJEU delivered its judgment in Joint Cases C-765/22 and C-772/22, Air Berlin Luftverkehrs KG. The judgment, which was briefly presented on this blog, addresses several novel issues related to the application of the European Insolvency Regulation. In the coming days, the EAPIL Blog will host an online symposium on this case. […]

, , ,

See You in Wrocław Next Week!

The second conference of the European Association of Private International Law will take place in Wrocław on 6-8 June 2024. As the readers of this blog know, the topic of the event will be Private International Law and Global Crises. Organised by Agnieszka Frąckowiak-Adamska, the conference will begin on 6 June, in the afternoon, with […]

Erik Jayme, 8 June 1934 – 1 May 2024

The author of this post is Martin Gebauer (Eberhard Karl University of Tübingen). Erik Jayme passed away on 1 May 2024, just five weeks before his expected celebration of his ninetieth birthday. He was born on 8 June 1934, in Montréal, in the francophone Canadian province of Québec. His parents were married on Christmas 1930 […]

Erik Jayme (1934-2024)

The editors of the blog of the European Association of Private International Law are sad to learn of the passing away of Erik Jayme. He would have turned 90 in a few weeks. Erik Jayme’s work, spanning over six decades, has had a distinctive influence on the renewal of private international law discourse. Among many […]

, ,

Linton on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Commercial Matters

Marie Linton (Uppsala University) has kindly prepared this presentation of her recent book titled ‘Erkännande och verkställighet av utländska domar i förmögenhetsrätt‘ (Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Commercial Matters), published by Norstedts Juridik 2023. What is the significance of a foreign judgment in Sweden? Is the judgment effective? Can assets in Sweden be seized […]

,

French Supreme Court Rules Allowance Claim Inadmissible for Divorce Granted Abroad

This post was written by Mathilde Codazzi, who is a doctoral student at Paris II Pantheon-Assas. In a judgment of 7 February 2024, the French Cour de cassation ruled that a compensatory allowance claim (“prestation compensatoire”) brought before French courts after the divorce was granted by a Belgian judgment is inadmissible. Background The spouses had […]

, ,

Zernikow on Conflict of Law Rules for Employment Contracts as Means to Achieve EU Integration

Marcel Zernikow (University of Pau and Pays de l’Adour) has kindly prepared this presentation of his recent book titled Les règles de conflit de lois confrontées au marché intérieur. Étude en droit international privé européen du travail (Conflict of Law Rules Confronted with the Internal Market. A Study of the European Private International Law of […]

,

The Dutch Courts on the Law Applicable to Matrimonial Property Regimes

This post was prepared by Nadia Rusinova (The Hague University of Applied Sciences). In a world where marriages often transcend borders and cultural lines, the challenges of international family law become ever more evident. Two recent Dutch court decisions provide compelling insights into how the courts navigate complex cases involving divorce and marital property regimes […]

,

Study on Child Abductions to Third Countries Prepared for the JURI Committee

The author of this post is Costanza Honorati, professor of EU Law at the University of Milan Bicocca. The JURI Committee of the European Parliament has commissioned and recently published an interesting Study on Parental Child Abductions to Third Countries. The Study is delivered by long-term expert Marilyn Freeman (University of Westminster), and builds on […]

, ,

Jueptner on A Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments

Eva Jueptner (University of Dundee) has kindly shared a presentation of her book titled A Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments: Why did the Judgments Project (1992–2001) Fail? published by Intersentia in 2024. A Hague Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments – Why did the Judgments Project (1992 -2001) Fail? provides the first comprehensive analysis of […]

, ,

Gridel on Financial Markets and Financial Instruments

Augustin Gridel (University of Lorraine) has kindly prepared a presentation in English of his monograph titled Marchés et instruments financiers en droit international privé (Financial Markets and Financial Instruments in Private International Law), published by Bruylant in 2023. The aim of this book is to describe the relationship between the law of financial markets and […]

, ,

Fellow EAPIL Members, Have You Received Your Credentials?

A few days ago, the redesigned EAPIL website was launched. Among other things, it features a reserved area for members of the European Association of Private International Law (MyEAPIL). An automated e-mail message was sent to all the 560 members of the Association on 11 March 2024, with their personal login credentials. Several members have […]

Ecofeminism and Private International Law: The Notion of “Event” under the Rome II Regulation

The author of this post is Sara De Vido, Associate Professor of International Law at the Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. This post, drawn from a broader article (S. De Vido, ‘The Privatisation of Climate Change Litigation: Current Developments in Conflict of Laws‘ Jus Cogens 6, 65–88 (2024)), explores the promise of ecofeminism as a […]

, ,

Foreign Patent Disputes under the Brussels I bis Regulation: AG Emiliou’s Opinion

The author of this post is Lydia Lundstedt, who is an Associate Professor and Senior Lecturer at Stockholm University. In the interest of transparency, author notes that she previously wrote an expert legal opinion on behalf of BSH Hausgeräte. On 22 February 2024, Advocate General (AG) Emiliou’s Opinion on the interpretation of Article 24(4) Regulation […]

,

Inkreal: Jurisdictional Barrier-crossing in Domestic Cases: A Threefold Critique

This post was contributed by Horatia Muir Watt and Dominique Bureau, who are respectively professors at Sciences Po Law School (Paris) and Paris II Law Faculty. This is the fourth contribution to the EAPIL’s online symposium on the ruling of the Court of Justice in Inkreal, after the posts of  Sergi Gimenez, Gilles Cuniberti and Pedro […]

,

IACPIL Conference on the Legal Protection of Vulnerable Adults in Central and Eastern Europe – Report

This post was written by Prof. Dr. Bea Verschraegen, Verena Wodniansky-Wildenfeld and Laurenz Faber. On 28 November 2023, the Interdisciplinary Association of Comparative and Private International Law (IACPIL) held a conference on the legal protection of vulnerable adults in Central and Eastern Europe. Against the backdrop of demographic and scientific developments impacting this field of the […]

, ,

From Theory to Practice in Private International Law: Gedächtnisschrift for Professor Jonathan Fitchen

Justin Borg-Barthet, Katarina Trimmings, Burcu Yüksel Ripley and Patricia Živković, from the University of Aberdeen, have accepted the invitation of the editors of the blog to present their co-edited book, titled ‘From Theory to Practice in Private International Law: Gedächtnisschrift for Professor Jonathan Fitchen’, published by Bloomsbury Publishing. The text below is cross-posted on Conflictoflaws.net. […]

, , ,

Private International Law and Global Crises – Registrations Now Open for the Next EAPIL Conference

It has already been announced on this blog that the next EAPIL conference will take place in Wrocław (Poland) between 6 and 8 June 2024, and will be devoted to Private International Law and Global Crises. Those willing to join the conference may now register for the event through the dedicated conference website. Please note […]

, ,

Legal Privilege and Transnational Evidence-Taking

René Jansen (former PhD Candidate at Tilburg University) has accepted the invitation of the editors of the blog to present his book, titled ‘Legal Privilege and Transnational Evidence-Taking – A Comparative Study on Cross-Border Disclosure, Evidence-Shopping and Legal Privilege’, published by Intersentia. The study is available in open access here. For the (revised) commercial edition, […]

Opportunities for PostDocs at the Humboldt University in Berlin

The graduate resesarch programme DynamInt (Dynamic Integration Order) of Humboldt University is inviting international PostDocs to apply for a short-term (3 to 6 months), fully paid research stay in Berlin. The PostDoc is supposed to pursue her/his research project in the field of European Law. She/he is also expected to interact with the group of […]

,

French Supreme Court Rules on Negligence in Taking the Required Steps under EU lis pendens Rules

This post was written by Mathilde Codazzi, who is a doctoral student at the University Paris II Panthéon-Assas. In a judgment of 22 November 2023, the French Supreme Court has ruled that a court is “deemed to be seized” under Article 16(a) of the Brussels II bis Regulation at the time which the document instituting […]

, , ,

EAPIL Winter School in Como – Registrations End Soon!

As announced on this blog, registrations for the EAPIL Winter School, which is taking place in Como between 12 and 16 February 2024, will close on 25 January 2024 Organised by the University of Insubria, in cooperation with the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, the University of Murcia and the University of Osijek, this year’s edition […]

,

Amsterdam Court of Appeal on the Scope of the Matrimonial Property Regimes Regulation

This blogpost is written by Stichting IJI (The Hague Institute for private international law and foreign law) On 13 June 2023 the Amsterdam Court of Appeal addressed the scope of Regulation (EU) 2016/1103 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in […]

,

The EAPIL Blog in 2023

The blog of the European Association of Private International Law has hosted some 300 posts in the course of 2023: 79 of them reported on (and analysed) recent case law, while 64 informed about (and discussed) recent normative developments, at the domestic, European and international level (in 2022, the blog published 75 posts on case […]

, ,

Succession Upon Death: A Comparison of European and Turkish Private International Law

Biset Sena Güneş, senior research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, has accepted the invitation of the editors of the blog to present her recent book, titled ‘Succession Upon Death: A Comparison of European and Turkish Private International Law’, written in English, and published by Mohr Siebeck. This book […]

, ,

Cross-Border Corporate Restructuring and European Private International Law

Fabian Kratzlmeier (Chicago) has accepted the invitation of the editors of the blog to present his recent book, titled ‘Die Grenzüberschreitende Unternehmensrestrukturierung im Europäischen Rechtsrahmen’ (Cross-border corporate restructuring and European private international law), published by Mohr Siebeck. Reorganizing viable firms (instead of liquidating them) has been the state of the art in U.S. bankruptcy law […]

, ,

GEDIP Adopts Position Paper on the Proposed Regulation on Parenthood

The European Group for Private International Law (GEDIP) has recently adopted a position paper on the proposal for a Council Regulation in matters of Parenthood. The Group welcomes that the EU intends to legislate in this field, since parenthood is a status from which persons derive numerous rights and obligations. However, the Group is of […]

, ,

EU PIL – Role Model or Hegemony?

Caroline Sophie Rapatz, Professor at the Christian-Albrecht University of Kiel, has accepted the invitation of the editors of the blog to present her recent book, titled ‘Das Internationale Privatrecht der EU – Vorbild oder Vormacht? Abgrenzungen und Wirkungen im Verhältnis zum nationalen und völkerrechtlichen Kollisionsrecht’ (European Union Private International Law – Role Model or Hegemony? […]

,

The 2023 Reform of the Maltese Gaming Act: A Valid Ground to Reject the Issuance of an EAPO?

The author of this post is Carlos Santaló Goris, lecturer at the Centre for Judges and Lawyers of the European Institute of Public Administration (Luxembourg). On 26 October 2023, the High Regional Court of Karlsruhe (Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe) rendered a judgment on an appeal confirming a decision of the Regional Court of Baden-Baden refusing to issue […]

, ,

Private International Law and Competition Litigation in a Global Context

Dr Mihail Danov, Associate Professor at the University of Exeter, has accepted the invitation of the editors of the blog to present his recent book, titled ‘Private International Law and Competition Litigation in a Global Context’, published in the Hart Publishing series on Studies in Private International Law. The book examines the private international law […]

,

SKATtered Dreams: UK Supreme Court Limits Revenue Rule, Danish Tax Authority’s Fraud Claim Goes to Trial

This post has been written by Dr Bobby Lindsay, Lecturer at the University of Glasgow. He is the author of a forthcoming book in the OUP Private International Law Series, entitled Cross Border Public Law Claims: Private International Law’s Exclusionary Rules. Introduction It is not uncommon for a Rule formulated within Dicey, Morris and Collins […]

, , ,

EAPIL Winter School Teaser Webinar

On 4 December 2023, at 6 p.m. CET, a free webinar will take place in preparation of the 2024 inaugural edition of the EAPIL Winter School on Personal Status and Family Relationships, which will be held on-site in Como between 12 and 16 February 2024 (a detailed brochure is available here). The webinar will give a glimpse […]

,

18th Regional PIL Conference on 17 November 2023 at the University of Niš, Serbia

This post has been written by Sanja Marjanović (Faculty of Law, University of Niš, Serbia) and Uglješa Grušić (UCL). The 18th Regional Private International Law Conference will take place on 17 November 2023 at the Faculty of Law, University of Niš, Serbia, with the support of the Deutche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH (GIZ). The theme […]

, , , , ,

Conclusions and Recommendations of the HCCH Special Commission on Child Abduction and Child Protection Conventions

The author of this post is Costanza Honorati, professor of EU law and private international law at the University of Milan Bicocca. She chaired the working group that prepared a position paper on behalf of the  European Association of Private International Law in view of the eight meeting of the Special Commission on the practical operation on […]

, , ,

Private International Law and Global Crises – EAPIL Conference on 6-8 June 2024 in Wrocław

After the first successful conference in Aarhus in 2022, the next conference of the European Association of Private International Law (EAPIL) will be held from 6 to 8 June 2024 at the University of Wrocław, Poland. The local host will be Agnieszka Frąckowiak-Adamska.  The Wrocław conference will focus on Private International Law and Global Crises. The […]

, , , ,

Registrations Are Open for the EAPIL Winter School in Como

As announced on this blog, the inaugural edition of the European Association of Private International Law Winter School will take place in Como between 12 and 16 February 2024. Organised by the University of Insubria, in cooperation with the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, the University of Murcia and the University Osijek, this year’s edition of the […]

,

French Supreme Court Confirms Foreign Adoption Judgments May Not Be Denied Exequatur for Lack of Consent of Legal Representatives

This post was written by Mathilde Codazzi, who is a doctoral student at the University Paris II Panthéon-Assas. In a judgment of 11 May 2023, the French Supreme Court For private and criminal matters (Cour de cassation) ruled that the requirement in the French civil code that the legal representatives of a child give their consent […]

, ,

Cross-Border Trade Secret Disputes in the European Union: Jurisdiction and Applicable Law

Lydia Lundstedt, Senior Lecturer in Private International Law at the Stockholm University and in Intellectual Property Law at the Linköping University, has accepted the invitation of the editors of the blog to present her recent book, titled ‘Cross-Border Trade Secret Disputes in the European Union: Jurisdiction and Applicable Law’, published by Edward Elgar. In today’s knowledge-based […]

,

Amendments to Bulgarian Private International Law, Child Protection Act and Civil Procedure Code

This post was written by Nadia Rusinova (Hague University of Applied Sciences). On 12 September 2023 a draft law to amend and supplement other statutes regarding the proceedings in civil cases under the application of the law of the European Union was submitted for consideration to the Bulgarian Parliament. The adoption of legislative changes in […]

, , , ,

Save the Dates – EAPIL Winter School in Como, 12 to 16 February 2024

The European Association of Private International Law, together with the Department of Law, Economics and Cultures of the University of Insubria (Italy), with the Law Faculty of the University of Murcia (Spain) and the Law Faculty of the Jagiellonian University in Kraków (Poland), is organising the first EAPIL Winter School. This inaugural edition will be […]

, , ,

Online Symposium on the Law Governing Arbitration Agreements: A View from Oslo

The post below was written by Giuditta Cordero-Moss, who is a Professor at the Department for Private Law, University of Oslo. It is the sixth and concluding contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the English Law Commission’s proposed reform of the law governing arbitration agreements. The other posts are written by Alex Mills, Manuel […]

, , ,

Online Symposium on the Law Governing Arbitration Agreements: A View from Vienna

The post below was written by Matthias Lehmann, who is Chair for Private Law, International Private Law and Comparative Law at the University of Vienna and an editor of the EAPIL blog. It is the fifth contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the English Law Commission’s proposed reform of the law governing arbitration agreements. […]

, , ,

Online Symposium on the Law Governing Arbitration Agreements: A View from Paris

The post below was written by Sylvain Bollée, who is Professor at Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne University. It is the fourth contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the English Law Commission’s proposed reform of the law governing arbitration agreements. The other posts are written by Alex Mills, Manuel Penades, George Bermann, Matthias Lehmann and Giuditta Cordero-Moss. […]

, , ,

Online Symposium on the Law Governing Arbitration Agreements: A View from NY

The post below was written by George A Bermann, who is Walter Gellhorn Professor of Law and Jean Monnet Professor of European Union Law at Columbia Law School. It is the third contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the English Law Commission’s proposed reform of the law governing arbitration agreements. The other posts are written by […]

, , ,

Online Symposium on the Law Governing Arbitration Agreements: A View from the Strand

The post below was written by Manuel Penades, who is a Reader in International Commercial Law at King’s College London. It is the second contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the English Law Commission’s proposed reform of the law governing arbitration agreements. The other posts are written by Alex Mills, George Bermann, Sylvain Bollée, […]

, , ,

Online Symposium on the Law Governing Arbitration Agreements: A View from Bloomsbury

The post below was written by Alex Mills, who is Professor of Public and Private International Law at University College London. It is the first contribution to the EAPIL online symposium on the English Law Commission’s proposed reform of the law governing arbitration agreements. The other posts are written by Manuel Penades, George Bermann, Sylvain […]

,

A New Editor Joins the EAPIL Blog Team!

The editorial team of the EAPIL blog has just become a bit larger! Ugljesa Grusic, an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Laws of UCL, has kindly accepted to join our invitation: thanks a lot, Ugljesa, and welcome! Please check out Ugljesa’s first post here. It’s a rather special first post, as it announces an on-line symposium, […]

, ,

Two Weddings, Two Children, Two Fathers? – The German Supreme Court Works its Magic

This post was written by Verena Wodniansky-Wildenfeld, University of Vienna. On 8 March 2023, the German Supreme Court issued a judgment on the paternity of two children. In the case at hand, the validity of the marriage of the mother, which gives rise to the presumption of paternity, had to be determined as a preliminary […]

, ,

The Significance of a Forum Selection Agreement as an Indicator of an Implied Choice of Law

The author of this post is Chukwuma Okoli, Assistant Professor in Commercial Conflict of Laws at the University of Birmingham, and Senior Research Associate at the University of Johannesburg. In a recent article, I explore what should be globally significant in a forum selection agreement as an indicator of the implied choice of law. This […]

, ,

Applicable Law Issues in International Arbitration

A new anthology titled Applicable Law Issues in International Arbitration has been published in the Hague Academy of International Law’s Centre of Resarch Series. The book is the result of research undertaken by scholars accepted to the Centre for Studies and Research in International Law and International Relations in 2021. Giuditta Cordero-Moss and Diego P. […]

, , ,

The EU Sustainability Directive and Jurisdiction

This post was written by Ralf Michaels and Antonia Sommerfeld, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, and is also available via conflictoflaws.net. The Draft for a Corporate Sustainable Due Diligence Directive currently contains no rules on jurisdiction. This creates inconsistencies between the scope of application of the Draft Directive and existing jurisdictional […]

,

Italian Supreme Court Rules on Jurisdiction over International Design Rights

The author of this post is Lydia Lundstedt, a Senior Lecturer at the Stockholm University. By a ruling of 17 May 2023 (No 13504), the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italian Supreme Court) held that the Italian courts lacked jurisdiction over an action concerning the non-infringement of an international design right. The decision raises several interesting […]

, , , , ,

Analysing the EU Parenthood Proposal – Many Questions and Some Tentative Answers

The authors of this post are Bernadette Boehl, Sophie Dannecker, Larissa Grundmann, Maira Gabriela Nino Pedraza (all University of Bonn). A series of webinars took place in May 2023 under the title The Future of Cross-Border Parenthood in the EU – Analysing the EU Parenthood Proposal. Experts from various Member States discussed the main elements of […]

,

EAPIL Blog in Summer Mode

As it is usual at this time of the year, the EAPIL blog will slightly slow down its activity for a few weeks. We’ll provide news on scholarship, recent case law and on-going legislative work every week, but we’ll limit ourselves to two or three post a week. The usual five-post-a-week pace will resume at […]

, ,

Draguiev on Interim Measures in Cross-Border Civil and Commercial Disputes

Deyan Draguiev is the author of this monograph published in 2023 by Springer. He has kindly provided the following abstract. The book proposes a holistic overview of interim measures and associated procedures in civil and commercial matters in international litigation and arbitration proceedings. It reexamines key features in this context and outlines novel findings on […]

, , , , ,

Consumer Protection under the Brussels I bis Regulation: Room for Improvement

The author of this post is Willem Visser. He is one of the editors of the Dutch Journal for Consumer Law and Unfair Commercial Practices (Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht & handelspraktijken). In April 2023, the EAPIL Working Group on the Reform of the Brussels I bis Regulation issued a preliminary position paper formulating proposals for reforming the […]

, , , ,

The Aftermath in Italy of the Ruling of the European Court of Human Rights in BEG

The author of this post is Michele Grassi, who is a post-doc at the University of Milan. In 2010, Bechetti Energy Group (‘BEG’) commenced proceedings against Italy before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The applicant complained that Italy had breached its obligations under Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) […]

, ,

Horizontal Solange Modified? Judicial Cooperation in Civil and Commercial Matters in the Rule of Law Crisis

This post was written by Felix M. Wilke. Many papers and posts have already appeared on the EU rule of law crisis, in particular on serious doubts regarding the independence and impartiality of the judiciary in certain Member States. In light of the recent judgment against Poland (C-204/21), more are likely to follow. For the […]

Conflict of Laws and the Metaverse

This post was written by Cécile Pellegrini who is Associate Professor at Lyon Catholic University (UCLy). It summarises a contribution to Metaverse and the Law, edited by L. Di Mateo and M. Cannarsa, Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming. The Metaverse Beyond Real Life Beyond the world as we know it, often referred to by the acronym […]

,

Which Law Governs UK’s Participation in the “War on Terror”?

This post was written by Ugljesa Grusic, Associate Professor at University College London. It offers a preview of the upcoming developments relating to Zubaydah v Foreign and Commonwealth Office, a case pending before the UK Supreme Court. While private international law is no longer regarded as an apolitical field, it is rare for it to become directly entangled in […]

,

The Swedish Supreme Court on the Localisation of Satellite Broadcast

The author of this post is Lydia Lundstedt, Senior Lecturer at the Stockholm University. Under Swedish copyright law, broadcasting organizations are granted certain exclusive rights over their broadcasts (“signal right”). A signal right is one of the “related” or “neighboring” rights to copyright along with the rights of performers and producers of phonograms. Pursuant to […]

, , ,

Webinar Series on the Future of Cross-border Parenthood in the EU – Last Chance to Register for the Last Webinar!

As noted earlier on this blog, on 24 May 2023, from 6 pm to 8 pm CEST, the forth and last webinar of the series that has been organised under the title The Future of Cross-Border Parenthood in the EU – Analyzing the EU Parenthood Proposal will take place. The webinar, chaired by Steve Heylen, […]

, , ,

Webinar Series on the Future of Cross-border Parenthood in the EU – Last Chance to Register for the Third Webinar!

As noted earlier on this blog, on 17 May 2023, from 6 pm to 8 pm CEST, the third webinar of the series that has been organised under the title The Future of Cross-Border Parenthood in the EU – Analyzing the EU Parenthood Proposal will take place. The webinar, chaired by Nadia Rusinova, will deal […]

, ,

Private International Law and Conflicts of Worldviews

In this post, Sandrine Brachotte presents her doctoral work on private international law and so-called “conflicts of worldviews”, which she undertook at Sciences Po Law School (Paris), in English, under the supervision of Horatia Muir Watt. The PhD Dissertation, entitled ‘The Conflict of Laws and Non-secular Worldviews: A Proposal for Inclusion’, offers an alternative theory […]

, ,

Bulgarian Supreme Court Judgment on Pancharevo – Correct Answer to a Wrong Question

This post was written by Nadia Rusinova (Hague University of Applied Sciences). The judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU in the Pancharevo case (C-490/20) drew the attention of the legal community across Europe (see post on this blog here), as it analyzed the compatibility with the EU law of the refusal to issue a Bulgarian […]

, , ,

Webinar Series on the Future of Cross-border Parenthood in the EU – Last Chance to Register for the Second Webinar!

As noted earlier on this blog, on 10 May 2023, from 6 pm to 8 pm CEST, the second webinar of the series that has been organised under the title The Future of Cross-Border Parenthood in the EU – Analyzing the EU Parenthood Proposal will take place. The webinar, chaired by Fabienne Jault-Seseke, will deal […]

, ,

Registered Partnerships in the EU – A Spanish Perspective on Regulation 2016/1104

Pablo Quinzá Redondo, Lecturer of Private International Law at the University of Valencia, is the author of this monograph published in 2022 by Tirant Lo Blanch. The author has kindly provided the following abstract. The European regulations concerning the property consequences of marriages and registered partnerships (Regulations (EU) 2016/1103 and 2016/1104, respectively) entered into application four […]

,

CJEU on Jurisdiction over Targeted Actions under the EU Trade Mark Regulation

The author of this post is Lydia Lundstedt, who is a Senior Lecturer at the Stockholm University. On 27 April 2023, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Lännen MCE (C-104/22) (no written opinion by the Advocate General) (also mentioned here on this blog) on factors relevant for establishing international jurisdiction over an infringement […]

Oliver Remien (1957-2023)

This post was written by Sören Segger-Piening, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg. It is with a heavy heart that I have to announce the passing of Oliver Remien on 24 April 2023 after a short, severe illness at the age of only 66. He held the Chair of Civil Law, European Economic Law, Private International Law and Litigation as well as […]

, , ,

International Commercial Courts for Germany?

This post was written by Giesela Rühl, LL.M. (Berkeley), Humboldt-University of Berlin, and is also available via conflictoflaws.net. On 25 April 2023 the German Federal Ministry of Justice (Bundesministerium der Justiz – BMJ) has published a bill relating to the establishment of (international) commercial courts in Germany. It sets out to strengthen the German civil justice system for […]

,

The Austrian Supreme Court on a Slippery Slope: The FIS Rules of Conduct and Article 17 of the Rome II Regulation

The author of this post is Verena Wodniansky-Wildenfeld, University of Vienna. Since the introduction of the Rome II Regulation, the question whether rules of conduct of non-governmental organisations are to be taken into account in the context of Article 17 of that Regulation has been the subject of extensive discussion. A recent decision of the Austrian […]

Jürgen Basedow, 29 September 1949 – 6 April 2023

This post was written by Giesela Rühl. The European Association of Private International Law mourns the loss of Jürgen Basedow, director emeritus of the Max Planck Institute of Comparative and International Private Law in Hamburg and one of the most influential private international law scholars of our times. He unexpectedly passed away on 6 April […]

, ,

European Commission’s Brussels I Study and Jurisdiction in Employment Matters – A Disappointment

The author of this post is Uglješa Grušić, Associate Professor, Faculty of Laws, University College London. As has already been reported on this blog, on 29 March 2023 the European Commission published a study to support the preparation of a report on the application of the Brussels I bis Regulation. This is an important and potentially very influential document. It […]

, , ,

Save the Dates: EAPIL Webinar Series on the Proposal for an EU Regulation on Parenthood

The European Commission has published in December 2022 an ambitious proposal for a new Regulation dealing with the private international law of parenthood (COM (2022) 695 final). With this proposal, the EU could for the first time adopt a private international law instrument dealing with the creation (and not only the effects) of a family […]

,

Infringement Procedure against Poland: Failure to Enforce English Return Orders

This post was written by Gilles Cuniberti and Anna Wysocka-Bar. On 26 January 2023, the European Commission has launched an infringement procedure against Poland for violation of the Brussels II bis Regulation. The EAPIL Blog has learnt about the details of one of the cases which has triggered this procedure. It is described below. Background […]

,

EAPIL Working Group on Brussels I bis Regulation Reform: Extended deadline for the survey

The EAPIL Working Group on the Reform of the Brussels I bis Regulation has set up a survey to collect feedback and comments on the proposals formulated in the preliminary position paper.   By now, over 60 participants from many different Member States have answered the survey. To allow an even broader participation, the deadline […]

,

The European Certificate of Succession and the Recording of Immovable Property in Land Registers

The author of this post is Francesca Maoli (University of Genova). On 9 March 2023, the CJEU delivered a judgment on the European Certificate of Succession, created by Regulation No 650/2012 on matters of succession, and the recording, in a land register, of a right of ownership in immovable property (C‑354/21, R.J.R. v Registrų centras […]

, , ,

Digital Services Act – Part Two: Inside the Belly of the Beast

This is the and final part of a post collectively written by Marion Ho-Dac and Matthias Lehmann. Part one is found here. The previous post has underlined the DSA’s indifference to PIL. In this post, we will take the example of “illegal content” to illustrate the need for a conflict-of-laws approach. DSA Regulation of Illegal […]

,

Jurisdiction in Employment Matters under Brussels I bis: A Proposal for Reform

The author of this post is Uglješa Grušić, Associate Professor at the Faculty of Laws of the University College London. As reported on this blog on 13 February 2023, the EAPIL Working Group on the Reform of the Brussels I bis Regulation has issued a preliminary position paper formulating proposals for reforming the Regulation. This […]

, , ,

Digital Services Act – Part One: An Outside Look at the Monster

This post was collectively written by Marion Ho-Dac and Matthias Lehmann. It consists of two parts. Part two can be found here. The Digital Services Act (DSA) is a landmark legislation in many respects, also regarding its volume (102 pages in the O.J., no less than 156 Recitals). It will force online platforms such as […]

,

Rights in Rem in the European Union: General Aspects and International Jurisdiction

This post has been written by Silvana Canales Gutiérrez, who is a Postdoctoral Researcher at Rovira i Virgili University (Tarragona). The “First International Seminar on rights in rem in the European Union: General Aspects and International Jurisdiction”, directed by Georgina Garriga (Universitat de Barcelona) and Maria Font (Universitat Rovira i Virgili), took place at the […]

, , ,

French Supreme Court Rules on the Application of Anational Norms under the 1980 Rome Convention

This post was contributed by Catherine Kessedjian, Professor Emerita of the University Paris Panthéon-Assas and Chair of the ADI/ILA 2023 Organising Committee. In a judgment of 16 November 2022 (pourvoi n° 21-17.338), the French Supreme Court for private and criminal matters (Cour de cassation) addressed, among many other issues, the application of anational norms such […]

, , ,

The Silent Death of Conflict-of-Law Provisions in EU Directives?

This post was written by Felix M. Wilke, University of Bayreuth. The new EU Sale of Goods Directive 2019/771 and its sibling, the Supply of Digital Content and Digital Services Directive 2019/770, understandably have attracted a lot of attention in the field of substantive private law. By contrast, to my knowledge, their (negative) private international […]

, ,

Joint EAPIL-BIICL (Virtual) Seminar on the Review of the Rome II Regulation: Last Chance to Register!

As noted earlier on this blog, on 2 December 2022, from 4 pm to 5.30 pm (MET), EAPIL will hold a joint Seminar via Zoom with the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL). The Seminar will focus on the review of the Rome II Regulation. Those wishing to attend have time until 30 November 2022 […]

, , ,

Five Takeaways from the First Meeting of the Special Commission on the Hague Adults Convention

This post was written by Pietro Franzina and Thalia Kruger, and is being published simultaneously on Conflictoflaws.net and on the EAPIL blog. The delegations of more than thirty Member States of the Hague Conference on Private International Law attended the first meeting of the Special Commission charged with reviewing the operation of the Hague Convention […]

, ,

Review of the Rome II Regulation – Analysis and Recommendations: Register Now for the Joint EAPIL-BIICL (Virtual) Seminar!

As noted earlier on this blog, on 2 December 2022, from 4 pm to 5.30 pm (MET), EAPIL will hold a joint Seminar with the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL). The Seminar will focus on the review of the Rome II Regulation and will, in this context, shed light on the Study that was […]

, , ,

Jurisdiction of Courts under the French Draft PIL Code

This post, written by Pascal de Vareilles Sommières, who is a Professor at the University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, is the seventh in a series concerning the proposed codification of French Private International Law. Previous posts relating to the French Draft Code addressed the issues of renvoi, foreign law, the recognition of marriages, companies and parentage. A German perspective […]

, , ,

Parentage under the French Draft PIL Code – Part 2

This is the second and final part of a post contributed by Estelle Gallant, regarding the provisions on parentage in the proposed codification of French PIL. The first part can be found here.  As explained in the first part of this post, the French draft code of private international law devotes an entire sub-section to parentage. […]

, , ,

Parentage under the French Draft PIL Code – Part 1

This post, written by Estelle Gallant, who is a Professor at the University of Toulouse Capitole, is the sixth in a series of posts concerning the proposed codification of French Private International Law. It is split into two parts: part one appears below, whereas part two will be published tomorrow. Previous posts relating to the French […]

,

AG Szpunar on the Territorial Scope of the Right of Communication to the Public

The author of this post is Lydia Lundstedt, who is a Senior Lecturer at the Stockholm University. On 20 October 2022, Advocate General Szpunar delivered his opinion (not yet available in English) in Grand Production (C-423/21) on the interpretation of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related […]

,

GEDIP’s Reccommendation on the Proposal for a Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence

This post was written by Hans van Loon. As reported in this blog before the European Commission on 23 February 2022 adopted a proposal for a directive on corporate sustainability due diligence. At its annual meeting in 2021, the European Group for Private International Law (GEDIP) had adopted a Recommendation to the EU Commission concerning the PIL aspects of […]

,

Some Insights from the EFFORTS Final Conference

The author of this post is Michele Casi, Post-doc, DILHPS Università degli Studi di Milano, and researcher involved in the EFFORTS (Towards more EFfective enFORcemenT of claimS in civil and commercial matters within the EU) project. The Final Conference of the EFFORTS Project (JUST-JCOO-AG-2019-881802) took place on 30 September 2022 at the Sala Napoleonica of the […]

,

“Through the Lense of Austrian Company law” – The Impact of Brexit on UK Limited Companies Based in Austria

This post was written by Robert Vogelauer, Vienna. In a decision of 27 January 2022 the Austrian Supreme Court ruled on how Brexit affects a British Private Limited Company (Ltd.) that was incorporated in England but conducted all of its business operations in Austria (OGH 9 Ob 74/21d). It did so only a couple of […]

, ,

The Brussels II ter Regulation: A Quick Look at Some Significant Innovations

The author of this post is Francesca Maoli, who is a Researcher at the University of Genova. The Brussels II ter Regulation on matrimonial matters, matters of parental responsibility and child abduction has become fully applicable on 1 August 2022, meaning that legal proceedings instituted on or after that date, as well as authentic instruments […]

, , ,

Companies under the French Draft Code of PIL

This post was contributed by Thomas Mastrullo, who is an Associate Professor of Commercial Law at the University  of Luxembourg. It is the fifth in a series of posts on the French draft code of private international law of March 2022 (the previous posts in the series gave a German perspective and discussed the issues of […]

, ,

The CJEU on the Brussels I bis Regulation and Patents Granted in Third States

The author of this post is Lydia Lundstedt, who is a Senior Lecturer at the Stockholm University. In IRnova (C-399/21), decided on 8 September 2022, the CJEU clarified the interpretation of Article 24(4) of the Brussels I bis Regulation. The latter provision confers exclusive jurisdiction “in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of patents, […]

,

More Post-Brexit Troubles – Proceedings in UK Unreasonable for Austrian Claimants

This post was written by Paul Lorenz Eichmüller, University of Vienna. Austrian law provides for an international forum necessitatis in Austria if this is necessary to avoid a denial of justice, i.e. if legal action abroad is (objectively) impossible or (subjectively) unreasonable, see § 28(1)2 Jurisdiktionsnorm (Civil Jurisdiction Act). The Austrian Supreme Court has recently issued […]

, , ,

A German Perspective on the French Draft PIL Code

This post was written by Stefan Leible and Felix M. Wilke (both University of Bayreuth). It is the fourth in a series of posts on the French draft code of private international law of March 2022 (the previous posts in the series discussed the issues of renvoi, foreign law and the recognition of marriages celebrated abroad). It is […]

,

H Limited – The Austrian Sequel

This post was written by Paul Lorenz Eichmüller, Vienna. After the Austrian Supreme Court had filed a reference for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU (see here) in a matter concerning the definition of “judgments” in the Brussels I bis Regulation’s provisions on recognition and enforcement, the CJEU rendered its decision in its much discussed case […]

,

Light Blogging Ahead

The EAPIL blog won’t stop running during the Summer, but new posts will come out at a slower pace in the coming weeks. Business as usual will resume at the beginning of September. Meanwhile, guest posts are always welcome. Those wishing to submit a piece, are invited to get in touch with the managing editor, […]

, ,

EAPIL Young Research Network: New Chairperson and Secretary

After more than 3 years of active involvement in the EAPIL Young Research Network, which she had co-founded together with Susanne Gössl in 2019, Martina Melcher has handed over the responsibility as one of the Network’s three chairpersons to Dora Zgrabljić Rotar. The Association is grateful to Martina for her work for, and continued commitment […]

, ,

“And We’ll Have the Brits Pay for that Litigation” – But Will We Really?

This post was written by Paul Lorenz Eichmüller, University of Vienna. Austrian civil procedure law contains a provision that requires foreign nationals bringing a claim in Austrian courts to provide security for the legal costs incurred by the defendant in case the claim should not be successful. However, as this would clearly violate the non-discrimination […]

, ,

Recognition of Marriages Celebrated Abroad under the French Draft PIL Code

This post was contributed by Fabienne Jault-Seseke, who is Professor at University Paris Saclay (UVSQ), and a member of GEDIP. It is the third of a series of posts on the proposed codification of French PIL (previous posts discussed the issues of renvoi and foreign law). The French draft code of private international law innovates […]

, ,

London Steam-Ship Owners: Looking Beyond the Case through the Lens of Res Judicata

This is the third contribution to an online symposium on the ruling of the European Court of Justice, of 20 June 2022, in London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Assistance Association Ltd v Spain. The first post was contributed by Adrian Briggs, the second one by Gilles Cuniberti. The post below was written by Antonio Leandro, who is […]

,

The EAPIL Blog’s Family Grows!

A new member has joined the editorial team of the EAPIL blog: Erik Sinander. Erik is a senior lecturer in private international law at the Stockholm University. Being specialized also in labour law, he hopes to contribute to the blog with posts about e.g. private international labour law as well as general developments in the […]

, ,

Jurisdiction over Foreign Patent Disputes Is Again Before the CJEU

The author of this post is Lydia Lundstedt, Senior lecturer at the Stockholm University. Jurisdiction over foreign patent disputes is again the subject of two new requests for preliminary rulings by the Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeals. The latest referral, BSH Hausgeräte (C-339/22), concerns the scope of Article 24(4) of Regulation No 1215/2012 (Brussels […]

, , ,

Policy Considerations Underlying the Rules on Jurisdiction – A Focus on Torts

The author of this post is Etienne Farnoux, who is a professor of law at the University of Strasbourg. He has recently published his doctoral thesis on the policy considerations that underlie the rules of international jurisdiction, with a special focus on torts (Les considérations substantielles dans le règlement de la compétence internationale des juridictions […]

, ,

HCCH Special Commission Issues Conclusions & Recommendations on Child Support and Maintenance

This post was contributed by Francesco Pesce, who is an associate professor at the University of Genoa. The very first meeting of the Hague Conference on Private International Law’s (HCCH) Special Commission (SC) on the Practical Operation of the 2007 Child Support Convention and 2007 Maintenance Obligations Protocol was held from 17 to 19 May […]

,

Live from Aarhus – Day Three of the EAPIL Founding Conference

The EAPIL blog is reporting about the Association’s founding conference in Aarhus by dedicated posts published at the end of each conference day. Day one and two were covered by the posts that can be found here and here, respectively. Please follow us on Twitter (@eapilorg) and LinkedIn for updates as the conference unfolds. Check out our new Instagram account, […]

,

Live from Aarhus – Day One of the EAPIL Founding Conference

The EAPIL blog will report about the Association’s founding conference in Aarhus by a dedicated post at the end of each conference day. Please follow us on Twitter (@eapilorg) and LinkedIn for updates as the conference unfolds. Check out our new Instagram account, too! The founding conference of the European Association of Private International Law has started! More […]

,

Meet the EAPIL in Aarhus!

The EAPIL founding conference is now just a few days away. As the readers of this blog know, the event will take place in Aarhus on 2, 3 and 4 June 2022. On 2 June, Peter-Arnt Nielsen (Copenhagen Business School) will provide kick-off the event with a key-note speech followed by a Report from Brussels, by Andreas Stein (Head of Unit, European […]

, ,

Incidental Issues in Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Case for Contract Interpretation?

This post was contributed by Yuliya Chernykh, who is associate professor in law at the Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences (campus Lillehammer). Addressing incidental issues in a blog post for the European Association of Private International Law feels like bringing a topic ‘back home’. Indeed, incidental or preliminary issues are a well-known concept and […]

,

The CJEU on Double Exequatur

This post was contributed by Vincent Richard, who practices with Wurth Kinsch Olinger in Luxembourg. On 7 April 2022, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in case C‑568/20, J v. H Limited on the recognition in Austria of an English summary order to pay a debt recognised in a third State judgment. The case shows […]

What Role for Private International Law in Youth-Led Climate Change Litigation?

The author of this post is Martina Mantovani, Phd Candidate at the University Panthéon-Assas. Climate change litigation has increased dramatically since 2015, the year of the Paris Agreement. A 2021 Report drafted by the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment inventoried more than 1.000 new cases brought to court over the past […]

, , ,

The Upcoming EAPIL Conference in Aarhus: 2-4 June 2022

The EAPIL founding conference is fast approaching! The conference will take place onsite in Aarhus on 2, 3 and 4 June 2022. Those wishing to attend, are invited to register by 14 April 2022 at the latest. Please do so by filling the form available here.  Registration fee is 100 Euros. Furthermore, you are very […]

, , ,

Funding Opportunities and Help for Scholars from Ukraine, Russia and Belarus

The EAPIL Board has been closely monitoring the evolving situation in Ukraine during the past two weeks and established contact with the Ukrainian members of EAPIL. Some members have left the country, others are still in Ukraine. All are in need of support. Several academic institutions in Europe offer funding or have established scholarships for refugee […]

, , ,

France Amends Rule on Effect of Foreign Birth Certificates

This post was contributed by Christine Bidaud, who is Professor at the University Jean Moulin – Lyon 3, co-director of the Family Law Center and member of the Research team Louis Josserand. French Background on Recognition of Foreign Birth Certificates of Children Born Abroad by Surrogacy If there is one subject that divides not only jurists […]

,

EAPIL Will Miss You, Peter

The European Association of Private International Law learnt with great sadness the passing of Peter Mankowski. The editors of the EAPIL Blog are most grateful to Ulrich Magnus for contributing the in memoriam published earlier today. While none of us knew Peter Mankowski as well as Ulrich Magnus, some of the Editors of this blog were […]

In memoriam Peter Mankowski (1966-2022)

This memorial was contributed by Prof. Dr. Ulrich Magnus. On 10 February 2022 Peter Mankowski passed away, entirely unexpected at the age of only 55. The European community of scholars of Private Law and in particular Private International Law lost one of its most brilliant and productive minds. He leaves behind the almost unbelievable number […]

, , ,

Vulnerable Adults – EAPIL Working Group Tasked with Responding to a Public Consultation

The European Commission has launched a public consultation on the prospect of an EU-wide protection for vulnerable adults, i.e., persons aged 18 or more who are unable to protect their interests because of an impairment or insufficiency of their personal faculties. In the document presenting the initiative, the Commission notes that vulnerable adults, together with […]

,

Functional Recognition of Same-sex Parenthood for the Benefit of Mobile Union Citizens – Brief Comments on the CJEU’s Pancharevo Judgment

This post was written by Johan Meeusen, who is a professor at the University of Antwerp and a Member of the Scientific Council of EAPIL. The post was posted first on the site of GEDIP. Introduction The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Pancharevo case (CJEU 14 December 2021, V.M.A./Stolichna […]

,

Electronic Consumer Contracts and Private International Law: Combining Targeting Test with Dis-targeting Test

The author of this post is Zhen Chen, PhD researcher of Private International Law at the University of Groningen. Consumer contracts are subject to protective choice of law rules both in China and in the EU. Under Article 6(1) of the Rome I Regulation, such consumer protective rules apply under the condition that the business […]

,

Hacked Crypto-Accounts and the Continued Importance of Rome II in the English Courts: Fetch.AI v Persons Unknown

This post was written by Amy Held and Matthias Lehmann. Prima facie, it does not seem that anyone need be overly concerned about the post-Brexit relationship between the Rome II Regulation and English law.  However, such complacency overlooks the continued relevance of the Rome II Regulation, as part of UK domestic law, in the English […]

, ,

CJEU Adds a New Piece to the ‘Mosaic’ in Gtflix Tv

The author of this post is Marco Buzzoni, Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg. On 21 December 2021, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) handed out its much-anticipated judgment in Case C-251/20, Gtflix Tv v DR (“Gtflix Tv”), a case dealing with the interpretation of Article 7(2) of […]

Hrvatske Sume: A View from Vienna

The post below was written by Matthias Lehmann, who is Professor of Private International Law at the University of Vienna. It is the fourth contribution to the EAPIL on-line symposium on the ruling of the Court of Justice in the case Hrvatske Sume d.o.o. Zagreb v BP Europa SE. The previous posts were authored by Peter […]

Hrvatske Sume: A View from Paris

The post below was written by Bernard Haftel, who is Professor of Private International Law at the University of Sorbonne Paris Nord. This is the third contribution to the EAPIL on-line symposium on the ruling of the Court of Justice in the case Hrvatske Sume d.o.o. Zagreb v BP Europa SE. The previous posts were […]

Hrvatske Sume: A View from Oxford

The post below was written by Adrian Briggs QC, who is Professor of Private International Law Emeritus at the University of Oxford. It is the second contribution to the EAPIL online symposium, announced by an earlier post, regarding the ruling of the Court of Justice in the case of Hrvatske Šume. The previous post of […]

Hrvatske Sume: A View from Hamburg

This is the first contribution to the on-line symposium regarding the ruling of the Court of Justice in the case of Hrvatske Šume. The author is Peter Mankowski, who is Professor of Private International Law at the University of Hamburg. It is based on the author’s case note in German, forthcoming in Recht der Internationalen […]

,

2021 at the EAPIL Blog

It’s been another busy year for the EAPIL blog. The 310 posts we have published in 2021 have attracted about 180.000 visits and some 190 comments. Interactions on social media have been on the rise, too. We witnessed an increase in the number of followers on LinkedIn (they are more than 1.000 now), and in the […]

Update on PIL Aspects of Environmental Damage and Human Rights Violations in Supply Chains

This post was contributed by Olivera Boskovic, who is a Professor at the Université de Paris. The situation of victims of environmental damages or human rights violations caused in non-EU countries by subsidiaries or subcontractors of companies established in the EU (but the issue can be extended to companies merely operating in the EU) trying […]

,

ELI at 10: Protection of Adults in International Situations

A series of webinars have taken place since June this year to celebrate European Law Institute’s 10th anniversary. The latest in the series is about the ELI project on the Protection of Adults in International Situations and is scheduled for 7 December 2021, from 18:15 to 19:45 (CET), The ELI project on adults seeks to encourage the European […]

,

Law Commission of England and Wales’s New Project on Conflict of Laws and Emerging Technology

The author of this post is Burcu Yüksel Ripley, who is a Senior Lecturer in law and the Director of the Centre for Commercial Law at the University of Aberdeen. On 25 November 2021, the Law Commission of England and Wales announced, as part of an update on its work on smart contracts, that it has agreed with […]

,

Overview of the European Parliament Proposal on a Statute for a European Association

This post was written by Thomas Mastrullo, Associate Professor at University of Luxembourg. Background The European Commission has for several years expressed its desire to increase the range of supranational structures. Thus, the creation of a European Association has been considered since the beginning of the 2000s (Communication from the Commission to the Council and […]

,

GEDIP Recommendation on the PIL Aspects of the Future EU Instrument on Corporate Due Diligence and Accountability

This post was contributed by Hans van Loon, a member of GEDIP and of the Institut de Droit International and a former Secretary General of the Hague Conference on Private International Law.  The European Group for Private International Law at its annual – virtual – meeting in September 2021 adopted a Recommendation to the EU Commission […]

,

The CJEU ruling in Toplofikatsia – Looking forward to the Service Regulation Recast!

This post was contributed by Vincent Richard, who practices with Wurth Kinsch Olinger in Luxembourg. On 9 September 2021, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in cases C-208/20 and C-256/20 Toplofikatsia Sofia e.a. on applying the Evidence and the Brussels I bis Regulations when the domicile of the defendant is unknown. Confronted once again with […]

, ,

Gruber and Samidani Trans: Dépeçage for International Employment Contracts

The author of this post is Erik Sinander, Senior lecturer at the Stockholm University. In a judgment of 15 July 2021, over two joined Romanian cases (C-152/20 and C-218/20, DG and EH v SC Gruber Logistics SRL and Sindicatul Lucrătorilor din Transporturi v SC Samidani Trans SRL), the CJEU confirmed that the choice of law rule for employment contracts […]

, , ,

The Rise (and Incipient Decline?) of the EPO Regulation in Spain

The author of this post is Carlos Santaló Goris, research fellow at the MPI Luxembourg and Ph.D. candidate at the University of Luxembourg. Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 establishing the European Payment Order (‘EPO’) introduced the first EU uniform civil procedure. The EPO Regulation aimed at facilitating the cross-border recovery of debt within the EU. According […]

, , ,

French Parliament Adopts Mandatory Law to Enforce Reserved Share in Succession Matters

The author of this post is Christelle Chalas, who is an Associate Professor at the University of Lille.  Background The French law on the compliance with the Republican Principles (projet de loi confortant le respect des principes de la République) introduces a new paragraph in Article 913 of the French Civil Code aiming at re-establishing a […]

,

“Waiver of State Immunity over Central Bank Accounts! Say No More!”, French Supreme Court Rules

This post was contributed by Dr. Sally El Sawah, Avocat aux Barreaux de Paris et du Caire, Registered Foreign Lawyer (England & Wales), Co-Founder & Head of Arbitration and Litigation at JUNCTION (Paris). In a judgment of 12 May 2021 (no. 19-13.853), the French supreme court for civil and criminal matters (Cour de cassation) ruled […]

The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice-of-Court Agreements: A Further Reply to Gary Born

After arguing that States Should Not Ratify, and Should Instead Denounce, the Hague Choice-Of-Court Agreements Convention, Gary Born received a series of serious criticisms by Trevor Hartley, Andreas Bucher and the Hague Conference of Private International Law. Mr Born has responded to some of these criticisms in two further posts at the Kluwer Arbitration Blog. […]

, ,

Jurisdiction in Matters Relating to Anti-competitive Practices – The CJEU in Volvo and Others

The authors of this post are Lena Hornkohl, LL.M. (College of Europe), Senior Research Fellow Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law, and Priyanka Jain, LL.M. (Coventry University), Research Fellow Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law. On 15 July 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued an important judgment regarding the […]

Fellow EAPIL Members: Have you Paid your Annual Fees?

Membership in the European Association of Private International Law entails the payment of a (small) annual fee. Fees are due on 31 January every year. For more information (and practical details on how to pay), please visit this page. Most of the 336 current members have already paid their fees for 2021. Those who haven’t […]

, ,

The EU’s Upcoming Regulatory Framework on Artificial Intelligence and its Impact on PIL

This post was contributed by Alexia Pato, who is Postdoc Research Fellow at the University of McGill (Montreal, Canada). The present post provides an overview of the legal initiatives on artificial intelligence (AI) recently launched at the EU level and the questions they generate from a private international law (PIL) perspective. The analysis starts with […]

, ,

Effectenbezitters: A Flawed Argument to Limit Jurisdiction under Article 7(2) of Brussels I bis

This is the fourth post of an online symposium on the recent judgment of the CJEU in Vereniging van Effectenbezitters v. BP after the posts of Matthias Lehmann, Laura van Bochove and Matthias Haentjens and Geert van Calster. The author of this post is Enrique Vallines, who is Professor of Procedural Law at the Complutense University […]

,

IPRax: Issue 3 of 2021

This post was drafted by Paul Lorenz Eichmüller, Vienna. This year’s third issue of the German journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (IPRax) contains two articles and several other case discussions of interest for European private international law.  In the first article, Andrew Dickinson (University of Oxford) discusses the applicable national and international rules of private international law that have been in force in the UK since the […]

Is the 2005 Hague Choice-of-Court Convention Really a Threat to Justice and Fair Play? A Reply to Gary Born

In a series of posts published at the Kluwer Arbitration Blog, Gary Born argues that States Should Not Ratify, and Should Instead Denounce, the Hague Choice-Of-Court Agreements Convention. At the invitation of the Editors of the EAPIL Blog, Trevor Hartley, Professor emeritus at the London School of Economics, replies. Gary Born starts by saying that […]

, ,

The Law Applicable to Electronic Securities: A New German Conflicts Rule

This post has been drafted by Dr. Felix M. Wilke, University of Bayreuth, Germany. A new contestant has entered the ongoing debate about the law applicable to Electronic Securities and/or in the blockchain context. On 10 June 2021, the new German Act on e-Securities (Gesetz zur Einführung von elektronischen Wertpapieren, eWpG) entered into force. Its […]

, ,

French Committee Proposes to Abandon Real Seat as a Connecting Factor in Company law

This post was contributed by Thomas Mastrullo, who is a lecturer at the Sorbonne Law School (Paris 1) On 31 March 2021, the Legal High Committee for Financial Markets of Paris (“Haut Comité juridique de la Place Financière de Paris” – HCJP) has published a report on the applicable law to companies  (Rapport sur le […]

,

French Supreme Court Rules on Manner of Exercise of Mandate under the Adults Convention

The author of this post is Estelle Gallant, professor of private law at the University of Toulouse 1 Capitole. In a judgment of 27 January 2021 the French Supreme Court for civil and criminal matters (Cour de cassation) applied the Hague Convention of 13 January 2000 on the International Protection of Adults (the ‘Adults Convention’) […]

,

French Supreme Court Rules on Ex Officio Application of EU Choice of Law Rules

This post was contributed by Fabienne Jault-Seseke, who is Professor at University Paris Saclay (UVSQ), and a member of GEDIP. On 26 May 2021, the French supreme court for private and criminal matters (Cour de Cassation) issued an important judgment requiring the ex officio application of a European conflict of laws rule. The Court specifically […]

,

Recognition and Registration of Same-sex Parentage Established Abroad as Mission Impossible for the Bulgarian Authorities

The author of this post is Nadia Rusinova, Lecturer in International/European Private Law at The Hague University of Applied Sciences. In October 2020, the Administrative Court of the City of Sofia in Bulgaria requested a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in a case concerning the refusal by the Sofia municipality to […]

,

Kyoto Guidelines on Intellectual Property and Private International Law

The following text has been kindly provided by professors Toshiyuki Kono, Pedro de Miguel Asensio and Axel Metzger. The International Law Association’s Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law has finished its work with the adoption and publication of the Kyoto Guidelines on Intellectual Property and Private International Law. The Guidelines are the outcome of an international […]

,

Registration is Now Open for the EAPIL Founding Conference in Aarhus on 2, 3 and 4 June 2022!

As announced earlier on this blog, the EAPIL Founding Conference will eventually take place on 2, 3 and 4 June 2022 in Aarhus, hosted by the Aarhus University. Registration for the conference is now open. See here for further details. A general presentation of the conference can be found here. See here for the full program as well as for […]

An Afterlife for the Lugano Convention in Relation to the United Kingdom: Reality or Fantasy?

The post below was written by Alex Layton, of Twenty Essex, London. It is the third and final contribution to an on-line symposium devoted to the fate of the 1968 Brussels Convention, launched after a post by Matthias Lehmann (Brexit and the Brussels Convention: It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue?), which attracted comments by Eduardo Álvarez-Armas, Apostolos Anthimos, […]

,

The Netherlands, a Forum Conveniens for Collective Redress? (II)

On 5 February 2021, a seminar entitled ‘The Netherlands, a forum conveniens for collective redress?’ was organised by the Amsterdam, Maastricht and Tilburg Universities, together with the Open University. A brief account of the seminar will appear in the Dutch Journal on PIL, NIPR. Experts addressed procedural and private international law features in European and particularly Dutch […]

,

Swiss Court Refuses Post-Brexit Application of the Lugano Convention – Even Good Cases Can Make Bad (Case) Law

This post was written by Rodrigo Rodriguez who is Professor on Insolvency Law at the University of Lucerne. Since 1 January 2021, as a result of the UK’s “hard Brexit” in respect of the field of cooperation in civil matters, the UK has not been a formal member of the 2007 Lugano Convention anymore. Much […]

, , , ,

Indonesia to Accede to the Hague Apostille Convention

The author of this post is Priskila P. Penasthika, Ph.D. Researcher, Erasmus School of Law, and Lecturer in Private International Law at Universitas Indonesia. For almost ten years I have been closely observing the discussions taking place between Indonesia and The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) on the matter of Indonesia becoming a contracting […]

Forlati on the Fate of the 1968 Brussels Convention: Some Thoughts from the Perspective of the Law of Treaties

The post below was written by Serena Forlati, Professor of International Law at the University of Ferrara. It follows a post by Andrew Dickinson which opened an on-line symposium devoted to the fate of the 1968 Brussels Convention. One more contribution will be published on this blog in the coming days. The symposium follows a lively […]

,

ERA Seminar on Digital technology in family matters – A Private International Law Perspective

The author of this post is Ségolène Normand, Postgraduate Student in Private Law at the University of Valenciennes. Digital technology has been investing all areas of society and its potential seems unlimited. At the global level, public institutions are progressively transforming in favour of eGovernment which involves rethinking both organisation and process, so that public […]

,

Private International Law in Europe – Webinar Rescheduled

As announced earlier on this blog, the Private International Law Interest Group of the Italian Society of International Law and EU Law organises a series of webinar titled Private International Law in Europe: Current Developments in Jurisprudence. The webinar scheduled to take place on 19 February 2021 on State Immunity and Jurisdiction in Civil and Commercial Matters in Recent […]

The Netherlands, A Forum Conveniens for Collective Redress?

On 5 February 2021, the Universities of Amsterdam, Maastricht and Tilburg, in collaboration with the Open University, organized an online seminar on The Netherlands, a forum conveniens for collective redress? A group of experts in the field addressed both procedural and private international law aspects of collective actions under the Dutch and European frameworks. The […]

, ,

Asian Principles for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

The post below was provided by Catherine Shen, Project Manager at the Asian Business Law Institute. Readers of the EAPIL blog are well aware that in Europe, harmonisation in the field of private international law has been enormously successful with efforts encompassing both the civil and commercial, as well as family, spheres. In relation to foreign judgments […]

, ,

French Supreme Court Rules on Respective Scopes of Brussels II bis Regulation and 1996 Hague Convention

The author of this post is Estelle Gallant, professor of private law at the University of Toulouse 1 Capitole. On 30 September 2020, the French Supreme Court for civil and criminal matters ruled on the respective scopes of the Brussels II bis Regulation and the 1996 Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and […]

,

The Rights of Persons with Cognitive Disabilities in Cross-border Situations

On 22 February 2021, from 5 to 7 pm CET, the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan will host a webinar titled The Fundamental Rights of Persons with Cognitive Disabilities in Cross-border Situations – Time for Italy and Spain to Join the Hague Adults Convention. The Hague Convention of 13 January 2000 on the […]

,

Private International Law in Europe: Current Developments in Jurisprudence

The Private International Law Interest Group of the Italian Society of International Law and EU Law has organised a series of webinar, most of which will be conducted in English, under the title Private International Law in Europe: Current Developments in Jurisprudence. The programme is as follows: 29 January 2021, 4 to 6 PM (CET): Limiting […]

,

Digital Teaching and Private International Law: Last Chance to Register for the Second EAPIL Virtual Seminar

As announced on this blog a few days ago, the second EAPIL Virtual Seminar, devoted to Digital Teaching and Private International Law, will take place on 27 January 2021 from 5 to 7 p.m. (MET). Around ninety persons have already registered and will soon receive the details to attend the seminar. All others interested in joining […]

, , ,

The Recast Service Regulation to Apply to Denmark

Pursuant to Protocol No 22 to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not bound by the measures enacted by the EU in the area of freedom, security and justice, including as regards judicial cooperation in civil matters. However, an agreement was concluded in 2005 between […]

, ,

Digital Teaching and Private International Law: Register Now for the Second EAPIL Virtual Seminar!

Digital teaching formats have been in discussion since they became technically possible. Nevertheless, in law and Private International Law, they never became the standard until spring 2020, when Covid-19 led to a general closure of university buildings in many countries. Thus, universities were forced to switch from in-class teaching to digital formats. As in general […]

,

Italian Constitutional Court Rules on Same-sex Couples’ Access to Parenthood Through Medically Assisted Procreation Abroad

The author of this post is Lorenzo Acconciamessa, a PhD student at the University of Palermo and a teaching assistant at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan. By a ruling of 4 November 2020, the Italian Constitutional Court declared that the combination of Italian rules precluding the formation of a child’s birth […]

,

Austrian Supreme Court on Choice-of-Court Agreements and the Assignment of Claims

The author of this post is Simon Laimer, professor at the Linz University. The claimant, an airline established in Austria, and the defendant, which operates a hotel in India, concluded a written contract for the accommodation of the airline’s crew members in the defendant’s hotel as well as their transfer from the airport to the […]

, , , ,

EAPIL Position Paper on the EEO Regulation

The EU has developed a common judicial area where judgments given in one EU Member State are recognised and can be enforced in all others. To this end, the EU has adopted a number of legal instruments that regulate and ease cross-border enforcement, ensuring legal certainty for all parties and making these processes easier. One […]

,

The Lithuanian Supreme Court Rules on the E.E. Case After the CJEU’s Judgment

This is a guest post by Katažyna Bogdzevič (Mikša), an associate professor of the Institute of International and European Union Law at the Law School of Mykolas Romeris University in Vilnius, Lithuania and an advisor to the Lithuanian Ministry of Justice.  The CJEU’s judgement in the case of E.E. case (C-80/19) has already attracted scholars’ attention and it […]

, , ,

Brexit and Private International Law – What Now?

As readers of this blog know, the first EAPIL (Virtual) Seminar, devoted to the impact of Brexit on Private International Law, will take place tomorrow from 11 am to 1 pm (MET). For more information on the event, see here. Registrations to the Seminar are now closed. The login details have been sent to the registered […]

, , ,

So Long, Savigny? The Case of Jurisdiction over External Directors’ Liability in Belgian Private International Law

The author of this post is Michiel Poesen, PhD candidate at KU Leuven. This post tells a short story about the fate of European private international law’s neutrality paradigm… Our story starts where you probably would not expect it: the 2019 Belgian company law reform. In 2019, the Belgian legislature reformed the Company Law Code […]

, ,

The Fate of Choice of Court Agreements Following an Assignment of Claims: A Recent Ruling of the Italian Supreme Court

The author of this post is Caterina Benini, a Phd student at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan. A Controversial but Topical Issue In the credits market, the price of a contract (or that of the claims arising from a contract) is determined by the nominal value of the claims concerned and […]

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Commercial Contracts

The author of this post is Franz Kaps, Lawyer at DL Piper, Frankfurt am Main. To stop the spread of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic governments closed ports and “non-essential businesses”, restricted travel and imposed “lockdowns” or “stay-at-home” orders. In cases where the COVID-19 pandemic or government measures disrupt commercial contracts, it is necessary to carefully […]

(Private) International Law for a Digitalised World – Collision, Coexistence or Combination?

The author of this post is Prof Dr Dan Jerker B. Svantesson, Professor at the Faculty of Law, Bond University (Australia), Visiting Professor at Masaryk University (Czech Republic) and Associated Researcher at the Swedish Law & Informatics Research Institute, Stockholm University (Sweden). On 6 December 2020, I had the great honour of giving a presentation […]

, , ,

Brexit and Private International Law: Register Now for the First EAPIL Virtual Seminar!

As announced earlier on this blog, EAPIL will hold its first Virtual Seminar on 11 December 2020, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. (MET). Devoted to the impact of Brexit on Private International Law, the seminar will feature speakers from the United Kingdom and the European Continent. They will analyze the legal framework that will apply to cross-border cases […]

, , ,

The First EAPIL (Virtual) Seminar – Brexit and Private International Law: What Now?

The first EAPIL Seminar will take place on 11 December 2020, from 11 am to 1 pm (MET). It will be devoted to the impact of Brexit on Private International Law. In short introductory statements speakers from the United Kingdom and the European Continent will analyse the legal framework that will apply to cross-border cases […]

,

Slovenian Supreme Court Applies the ECJ ruling in Korana to Enforcement Proceedings

The author of this post is Jorg Sladič, associate professor of International and European Law at the European Faculty of Law in Ljubljana. On 11 August 2020, the Slovenian Supreme Court dismissed an appeal challenging the enforcement of an Austrian judgement compelling the judgment debtor to pay levies to the Austrian Construction Workers’ Annual Leave and […]

, ,

The Court of Justice on the Succession Regulation: Carlos Santaló Goris on the E.E. Case

The EAPIL Blog hosts today two posts on the ruling of the Court of Justice in E.E., a case regarding the Succession Regulation decided on 16 July 2020. The first post, by Matthias Lehmann, appeared this morning. The second post, by Carlos Santaló Goris, a research fellow at the MPI Luxembourg and a Ph.D. candidate […]

Human Rights in Global Supply Chains: Do We Need to Amend the Rome II Regulation?

This post was written by Giesela Rühl, LL.M. (Berkeley), Humboldt-University of Berlin, and is also available via conflictoflaws.net. The protection of human rights in global supply chains has been high on the agenda of national legislatures for a number of years. Most recently, also the European Union has joined the bandwagon. After Commissioner for Justice Didier Reynders announced […]

,

The Italian Constitutional Court Asked to Rule on Surrogacy Arrangements and Public Policy

The author of this post is Lorenzo Acconciamessa, a PhD candidate at the University of Palermo and a teaching assistant at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan. By an order of 29 April 2020 the First Chamber of the Italian Supreme Court asked the Italian Constitutional Court to review the constitutional legitimacy […]

,

Another Preliminary Reference on the Succession Regulation Involving (and Referred by) a Polish Notary

The author of this post is Carlos Santaló Goris, research fellow at the MPI Luxembourg and PhD candidate at the University of Luxembourg. On 3 August 2020, a Polish notary referred a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”). The facts are simple: a Ukrainian citizen living […]

, ,

Luxembourg Introduces Bill to Adopt Collective Redress Procedure Ahead of EU Directive

This post has been written by Vincent Richard, Senior Research Fellow at the MPI Luxembourg, Department of European and Comparative Procedural Law. On 14 August 2020, the Luxembourg government introduced a bill before the Parliament aiming to introduce a collective redress procedure (file 7650) into Luxembourg Law. This objective was set out in the coalition […]

,

COVID-19 and the Right to Respect for Family Life under Article 8 ECHR

The author of this post is Nadia Rusinova, Lecturer in International/European Private Law at The Hague University of Applied Sciences. This is the sixth in a series of posts aimed to explore the impact of the coronavirus crisis on the phenomena of mobility and exchange that form the constituent elements of private international law, and to discuss the […]

, ,

Mastermelt Ltd v Siegfried Evionnaz SA: Would the Lugano Convention Provide a Level Playing Field for Judicial Cooperation Post-Brexit?

The author of this post is Aygun Mammadzada, PhD Researcher at the Institute of Maritime Law of the University of Southampton. Status quo Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union leaves many uncertainties and puzzling effects on civil justice and cross-border judicial cooperation. Upon its departure on 31 January 2020 the United Kingdom ceased to be a […]

,

EAPIL Establishes Working Groups

In accordance with its goal to be a pan-European forum for reflection on issues of private international law, the European Association of Private International Law is seeking to establish working groups which will reflect on selected topics of private international law and submit their conclusions for endorsement by the Association. EAPIL Working Groups might be […]

, ,

Impact of Coronavirus on English Civil Proceedings: Legislative Measures During Emergency and Potential Outcomes

The author of this post is Aygun Mammadzada, PhD Researcher at the Institute of Maritime Law of the University of Southampton. This is the fifth in a series of posts aimed to explore the impact of the coronavirus crisis on the phenomena of mobility and exchange that form the constituent elements of private international law, and to discuss the […]

, , , ,

The COVID-19 Crisis and Employment Contracts: the Italian Emergency Legislation on Dismissals

The author of this post is Caterina Benini, a PhD student at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan. This is the fourth in a series of posts aimed to explore the impact of the coronavirus crisis on the phenomena of mobility and exchange that form the constituent elements of private international law, […]

Álvarez-Armas on the Law Applicable to Human-rights-related Torts in the EU as Compared with Environmental Torts

The author of this post is Eduardo Álvarez-Armas, Brunel University London and Université Catholique de Louvain. As announced in this blog, Anne Peters, Sabine Gless, Chris Thomale, and Marc-Philippe Weller have recently published an interesting and topical paper entitled Business and Human Rights: Making the Legally Binding Instrument Work in Public, Private and Criminal Law. The paper, a must-read […]

,

Law and Global Value Chains at the Time of Covid-19: A Systemic Approach Beyond Contracts and Tort

The author of this post is Tomaso Ferando, Research Professor at the University of Antwerp. This is the third in a series of posts aimed to explore the impact of the coronavirus crisis on the phenomena of mobility and exchange that form the constituent elements of private international law, and to discuss the responses that […]

, , ,

The Impact of Corona Virus on the Management of Judicial Proceedings in Italy

The author of this post is Giovanni Chiapponi, research fellow at the MPI Luxembourg. The post is based on a presentation given at the weekly meeting of researchers of Department 1 of the MPI Luxembourg on 11 March 2020. This is the first in a series of posts aimed to explore the impact of the coronavirus […]

, ,

The Dialogue Between Judges on the Legal Status of Children Born Through Surrogacy

The author of this post is Marlene Brosch, senior research fellow at the MPI Luxembourg. The first advisory opinion of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) under Protocol 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), rendered on 19 April 2019, tackled no less than the highly sensitive and controversial topic of surrogacy […]

Mantovani on Contractual Obligations as a Tool for International Transfers of Personal Data

The post below was written by Martina Mantovani, Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg. The Schrems II case, currently pending before the CJEU, has brought into the spotlight the possibilities offered by Article 26 of Directive 95/46/EC and by Article 46 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) for transferring personal data outside […]

French Supreme Court Extends Recognition of Foreign Surrogacies and other MAPs

The author of this post is François Mailhé (University of Amiens). On 18 December 2019, in three decisions, the French Cour de cassation decided to go one (last?) step further in the efficiency of foreign surrogacy and other medically-assisted procedures (MAPs): the birth certificate mentioning one man as “father” and another man as “parent”, or one woman […]

,

Aarhus Conference: Early Bird Registration Fees Available Until 20 December

As advertised in a previous post, the founding conference of the European Association of Private International Law will take place in Aarhus on 14-16 May 2020. The detailed programme of the conference is available here, together with information on transport and accommodation. Those wishing to attend the conference are asked to register here. An early […]