Association's events Conferences, academic events etc. Developments in PIL EAPIL

Save the date: EAPIL Seminar on the Rome II Regulation

by Pietro Franzina

11 October 2022

On Friday, 2 December 2022, at 4 pm, EAPIL will hold an online seminar on the Rome II Regulation.

The seminar will shed light on the Study that was prepared in 2021 by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL) in consortium with Civic Consulting to support
the preparation of the report on the application of the Rome II
Regulation.

The speakers will be: Eva Lein (BIICL / University of Lausanne), Constance Bonzé (BIICL), Xandra Kramer (University of Rotterdam), Martin Ebers (University of Tartu), Marie Louise Kinsler (2 Temple Gardens, London).

More information (including a detailed program and registration
information) will be made public on this blog in November.

Adrian Briggs on Worldwide Freezing Injunctions Granted in Common Law Jurisdictions: A Civil Law Perspective: “To pick up the reference to the case of Gambazzi, if the application is to enforce or otherwise give effect…”
Gilles Cuniberti on Worldwide Freezing Injunctions Granted in Common Law Jurisdictions: A Civil Law Perspective: “Many thanks indeed, Pietro. The same issues were raised and addressed similarly in France. First, a distinction between the civil…”
Matthias Lehmann on Worldwide Freezing Injunctions Granted in Common Law Jurisdictions: A Civil Law Perspective: “Many thanks for relaying this fascinating decision! The Corte di cassazione deserves to be commended for its open and realistic…”
Andreas Bucher on Jurisdiction in Employment Matters under Brussels I bis: A Proposal for Reform: “Interesting, however still consideerably complicated. Should the position not be that weaker party would be better protected if the grounds…”
Gilles Cuniberti on French Supreme Court Rules Certificate Provided for in Article 53 Brussels I bis May Be Served 5 Minutes before Enforcement: “Dear Adrian, I guess it depends whether you consider that the debtor could apply for refusal of enforcement even before…”

%d bloggers like this: